Skip to main content

Is holonym.id a Scam? Security Check Results - holonym.id Reviews

H

Is holonym.id Safe? Security Analysis for 502 Bad Gateway

Check if holonym.id is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherIndonesiasmall
nginx 1.18.0UbuntuDigitalOcean DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:48:51 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website holonym.id is currently inaccessible, serving a 502 Bad Gateway error page generated by an nginx server on Ubuntu. This indicates a server-side issue preventing access to any meaningful content or business information. The domain is registered through PT Jagat Informasi Solusi, an Indonesian registrar, with a creation date in April 2022 and a 5-year registration term, suggesting a legitimate business intent but relatively new presence. Hosting is provided by DigitalOcean, but no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers or HTTPS status details are available from the data provided. Due to the lack of accessible content, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, nor any contact information or social media links. The site currently lacks any visible branding or business description, resulting in a poor content quality and business credibility score. Security posture is minimal but not compromised, with no WAF or blocking detected. Overall, the site is not currently functional for users or evaluators.

Detected Technologies

nginx 1.18.0UbuntuDigitalOcean DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain registration data, holonym.id appears to be a small Indonesian business or startup founded in 2022. The lack of accessible website content prevents detailed analysis of market positioning, services, or business model. The domain registration is consistent with the claimed country and registrar. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or related domains are identified. The absence of any business information or contact details on the site limits the ability to assess revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators. The business likely has not yet launched or is experiencing technical difficulties preventing public access.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of any visible security policies, headers, or compliance indicators. The 502 Bad Gateway error suggests backend server issues that could impact availability and reliability. No evidence of HTTPS or SSL configuration was found in the data provided, which is a critical security requirement. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or certifications are present. The domain registration is transparent and consistent, which is a positive trust factor. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in operational stability, security best practices, and compliance documentation to meet industry standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the 502 Bad Gateway server error promptly to restore website availability.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
nginx 1.18.0UbuntuDigitalOcean DNS
SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible due to 502 Bad Gateway error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.sendinblue.com mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: cdh6yldyvhrg4sjlyavnppvdualzic4nje7qlsracncghupkt4na.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(588 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:24.144.76.158, 31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.com
ns2.digitalocean.com
ns3.digitalocean.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
15: cdh6yldyvhrg4sjlyavnppvdualzic4nje7qlsracncghupkt4na.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1745402549, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.sendinblue.com mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on DigitalOcean infrastructure with DNS managed by DigitalOcean name servers. The server runs nginx 1.18.0 on Ubuntu, but currently returns a 502 Bad Gateway error, indicating backend server or gateway issues. No CMS or frameworks are detected due to lack of content. No meta tags, scripts, or analytics tools are present. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. The site lacks any visible performance or accessibility optimizations. The technical debt includes server configuration issues causing downtime and absence of modern security and compliance features. Addressing these technical issues is critical for operational stability and user trust.
Analyze Another Website