Skip to main content

Is hostscore.net a Scam? Security Check Results - hostscore.net Reviews

hostscore.net favicon

Is hostscore.net Safe? Security Analysis for HostScore: Discover Web Hosting Services You Can Rely On

Check if hostscore.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptCloudflare DNSRank Math SEOWP Rocket (performance optimization)
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:07:47 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

HostScore.net is a web hosting review platform established in 2019, providing users with information and ratings to help select reliable web hosting services. The website is built on WordPress and employs modern performance optimization tools such as WP Rocket and Cloudflare DNS. While the site demonstrates good content quality and user experience, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS likely enabled but missing advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No direct contact information or incident response policies are published, which could impact user confidence. Overall, the site is credible for its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and transparency measures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCloudflare DNSRank Math SEOWP Rocket (performance optimization)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

HostScore operates in the technology sector focusing on web hosting reviews, targeting website owners and developers seeking hosting solutions. The business model centers on providing comparative information and possibly affiliate referrals. The domain age and registration details align with a small, specialized platform. The site uses third-party services like Google Tag Manager and GTranslate, indicating an intent to reach a global audience. Lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials suggests room for growth in market positioning and credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers like CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy is published, and no dedicated incident response contacts are available. Forms present on the site (implied by WPForms) should be reviewed for secure handling of user data. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

HostScore is a platform focused on providing information and reviews about web hosting services to help users find reliable hosting providers.

Key Services:
web hosting reviewshosting provider ratingshosting service comparisons
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCloudflare DNSRank Math SEOWP Rocket (performance optimization)
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
GTranslate
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses WordPress CMS with performance optimizations via WP Rocket.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all v=spf1 include:emailsrvr.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:f3ff6c52b89d4dfd88d209cb17bc4355@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:hostscore.net
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/13/2025 (42 days)
SANs:hostscore.net, *.hostscore.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(248 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.112.1, 104.21.96.1, 104.21.16.1, 104.21.32.1, 104.21.48.1, 104.21.80.1, 104.21.64.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:7001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:1001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:2001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:3001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:4001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:5001, 2606:4700:3030::6815:6001
Name Servers:
aaden.ns.cloudflare.com
jamie.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
71: route2.mx.cloudflare.net
63: route1.mx.cloudflare.net
15: route3.mx.cloudflare.net
SOA:Serial: 2378930221, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:111ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net ~all v=spf1 include:emailsrvr.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with performance enhancements via WP Rocket and uses Cloudflare DNS services. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and GTranslate for multilingual support. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with Rank Math PRO. However, no advanced frameworks or custom technologies are detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security configurations. The technical stack is typical for small to medium-sized content platforms but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities and updated to maintain security and performance.
Analyze Another Website