Skip to main content

Is hot-tents.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Hot-Tents Camping Reviews

hot-tents.com favicon

Is hot-tents.com Safe? Security Analysis for Hot-Tents Camping

Check if hot-tents.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPressjQueryFont AwesomeSimple Social Buttons pluginFacebook SDK+1 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 12:39:14 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Hot-Tents Camping is a niche blog focused on hot tent camping and outdoor wood stoves, primarily featuring content about POMOLY brand products. The website operates on a WordPress platform with common plugins and scripts such as jQuery, Font Awesome, and social sharing tools. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but could be improved by adding security headers and privacy policies. No contact information or privacy compliance mechanisms are present, which impacts trust and compliance scores. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and provides relevant, well-structured content for outdoor enthusiasts.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryFont AwesomeSimple Social Buttons pluginFacebook SDKBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets outdoor camping enthusiasts interested in hot tent stoves and related gear. It operates as a content publishing platform with a small business size and no evident parent or subsidiary companies. The site has partnerships or affiliations with nedspot.com and bushmantrip.com, indicating a network of related outdoor or travel content providers. The business model is primarily informational, likely monetized through affiliate links or advertising, though no explicit affiliate programs were detected. The content is authored consistently by a single author, suggesting a focused editorial approach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Tracking is done via Baidu Analytics and Facebook SDK, but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, raising privacy compliance concerns.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Hot-Tents Camping

Description:

A blog focused on hot tenting and outdoor camping gear, featuring articles primarily about POMOLY outdoor wood stoves and camping equipment.

Key Services:
Informational blog content about camping stoves and gear
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryFont AwesomeSimple Social Buttons pluginFacebook SDKBaidu Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Facebook SDK
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based blog focused on hot tent camping and related stoves.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:170.106.168.148
Name Servers:
ns1.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns2.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns3.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns4.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns5.myhostadmin.netDNS only
ns6.myhostadmin.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.ym.163.com
SOA:Serial: 2020051634, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:432ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a standard set of plugins and scripts. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements and includes social media integration via Facebook SDK. Analytics are provided by Baidu Analytics. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC indicates room for technical security improvements. Hosting provider details are not explicit beyond the registrar information.
Analyze Another Website