Skip to main content

Is houstonchronicle.com a Scam? Security Check Results - houstonchronicle.com Reviews

houstonchronicle.com favicon

Is houstonchronicle.com Safe? Security Analysis for Access to this page has been denied

Check if houstonchronicle.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
PerimeterX
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:48:10 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.houstonchronicle.com is currently inaccessible due to a PerimeterX Web Application Firewall (WAF) captcha challenge that blocks direct content access. This prevents extraction of meaningful business, contact, or policy information. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable or the domain appears unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. The site appears to be a media/news outlet based on the domain name and industry classification, but no direct content or metadata is accessible to confirm this. Technically, the site uses PerimeterX for bot mitigation and security, but no other technologies or CMS platforms are identifiable due to the blocked content. Security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of security hardening. Privacy and compliance policies are not detectable, and no contact or incident response information is available. Overall, the site’s current state severely limits trust and usability, resulting in a low AI score and high risk profile.

Detected Technologies

PerimeterX

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain name suggests a media company serving the Houston area, likely providing news and related services. The absence of visible business information, contact details, or policy documents limits assessment of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The use of PerimeterX indicates an investment in security, possibly reflecting a high-traffic or high-value site. However, the inability to verify domain registration or company details reduces confidence in the business credibility and operational transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is partially observable through the presence of PerimeterX WAF, which provides bot mitigation and protection against automated attacks. However, the lack of accessible content prevents evaluation of HTTPS usage, security headers, or vulnerability exposure. No privacy or incident response policies are found, indicating potential compliance gaps. The domain’s WHOIS data absence further complicates trust assessment. Overall, the security maturity appears moderate in terms of external protection but lacks transparency and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Work with domain registrar or hosting provider to resolve WHOIS data availability and ensure domain registration transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content is a PerimeterX captcha challenge blocking access to the website content.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Technologies:
PerimeterX

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
PerimeterX

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to PerimeterX WAF captcha challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

82/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:205.220.176.159 ip4:205.220.164.154 ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 2 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:34.197.233.251, 34.204.119.243, 34.198.86.45, 34.235.224.231
Name Servers:
ns1.hearstnp.comDNS only
ns2.hearstnp.comDNS only
ns3.hearstnp.comDNS only
ns4.hearstnp.comDNS only
ns5.hearstnp.comDNS only
ns6.hearstnp.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: houstonchronicle-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1755636301, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:187ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:205.220.176.159 ip4:205.220.164.154 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website employs PerimeterX technology for bot detection and mitigation, as evidenced by the captcha challenge scripts and styles. No other frameworks, CMS, or hosting details are discernible due to blocked content. The site loads Google Fonts for typography. The HTML content is minimal and focused solely on the captcha challenge interface. Performance, SEO, accessibility, and mobile optimization cannot be assessed. The technical infrastructure appears to prioritize security at the expense of content accessibility, which may impact user experience and search engine indexing.
Analyze Another Website