Skip to main content

Is hqrgroup.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA "HQR Group" Reviews

S

Is hqrgroup.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA "HQR Group"

Check if hqrgroup.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
HTML5CSSjQuery
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:18:40 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

HQR Group is a Latvian multifunctional company established in 2004, offering services in beauty care, hospitality, and construction sectors. The website presents the company as a local service provider with a beauty salon, a seaside bar, and construction/renovation services. The business targets local customers in Riga and Saulkrasti, emphasizing customer satisfaction and quality service. The website content is primarily in Latvian and includes contact details and company registration information, supporting business credibility. Technically, the website uses basic HTML, CSS, and jQuery, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility but lacks modern SEO and performance enhancements. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation and absence of security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in multiple sectors including hospitality (beauty salon and bar) and construction, diversifying its revenue streams. The business model focuses on local service delivery with a small company size. Market positioning is stable with over 15 years of operation, but limited digital presence and lack of advanced marketing or analytics tools suggest room for growth. Partnerships with related domains like friziersalons.lv indicate a small ecosystem. The absence of social media and analytics tools limits customer engagement and data-driven decision making. The company provides clear contact information and physical addresses, enhancing trust. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@hqrgroup.lv
s*****@friziersalons.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712929****
+3712677****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

SIA "HQR Group"

Registration Number:

40103285662

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing immediate risk, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor data protection practices. No incident response or security policy information is available, suggesting low security maturity. The WHOIS query limit error prevents verification of domain registration details, which is a concern for trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires urgent improvements to meet basic web security standards and GDPR compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA "HQR Group"

Description:

HQR Group is a multifunctional company founded in 2004, offering services in beauty care, entertainment, and construction/renovation sectors. They operate a beauty salon 'Stilõ', a seaside bar 'Sunset bar', and provide construction and renovation services.

Key Services:
Beauty salon servicesBar and entertainment servicesConstruction and renovation services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSjQuery
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and contains business-related content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.205 ip4:85.31.97.30 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:91.203.68.192/28 +ip4:193.46.236.34 -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1008-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.205
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: hqrgroup.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070600, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:263ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.205 ip4:85.31.97.30 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.68.160/27 +ip4:91.203.68.192/28 +ip4:193.46.236.34 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML5, CSS, and jQuery without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The design is simple and functional but lacks modern responsive design features and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate with no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site includes a navigation select menu for mobile users but no complex forms or interactive elements. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. The technical debt is moderate, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website