Skip to main content

Is href.li a Scam? Security Check Results - href.li Reviews

H

Is href.li Safe? Security Analysis for href.li: hide your referrer

Check if href.li is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSSJavaScript
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:49:57 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

href.li is a small technology-focused website offering a niche privacy service that allows users to create anonymous links which hide the HTTP Referer header. The service targets general internet users who seek to protect their privacy when sharing URLs. The website is simple and functional, providing a form to generate anonymized short links with an expiry date. The market position is that of a specialized privacy tool with limited direct competition. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without advanced frameworks or CMS, resulting in moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is minimal; no security headers or policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided. The domain WHOIS is privacy protected, consistent with the privacy-centric nature of the service, but this reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures, which impacts trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model is a free online service providing URL anonymization to protect user privacy. The target audience includes privacy-conscious internet users. There is no evidence of monetization, advertising, or affiliate programs. The service operates in the technology sector, focusing on privacy tools. The lack of business contact information and policies suggests a small or individual operator rather than a large enterprise. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The website content is basic but relevant to its purpose. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are limited by minimal online presence and lack of business transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. It lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are critical for protecting users against common web attacks. There is no published privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which reduces the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The form input is minimally enhanced with JavaScript but lacks advanced security controls. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Create an anonymous link that will hide the HTTP Referer header. The service allows users to create short links with an expiry date that anonymize the referrer information.

Key Services:
Anonymous URL shorteningReferrer header hiding
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Form input selection enhancement via JavaScript

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides a simple service to hide HTTP referrer headers via URL anonymization.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.27, 192.0.78.26
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.comDNS only
ns2.wordpress.comDNS only
ns3.wordpress.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2012012901, TTL: 14400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:161ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple technology stack consisting of HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected frameworks or CMS. The site loads a CSS file from its own domain and uses inline JavaScript for basic UI enhancements. Performance is moderate given the minimal content and resources. SEO optimization is basic with a meta description but no Open Graph or structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present in basic form labeling and input focus behavior. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not provided, limiting deeper technical assessment. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website