Skip to main content

Is htaccessredirect.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Dan's Tools Reviews

htaccessredirect.net favicon

Is htaccessredirect.net Safe? Security Analysis for Dan's Tools

Check if htaccessredirect.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:07:11 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.htaccessredirect.net offers a specialized online tool for generating .htaccess files to assist web developers and administrators with tasks such as redirects, caching, password protection, and bot blocking. It operates under the brand Dan's Tools and appears to be a niche utility service monetized primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing. The site is technically mature, employing modern frontend frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, and integrates Google Analytics and Adsense for tracking and monetization. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and branding suggest a legitimate service. Security posture is moderate, with no advanced security headers detected and no cookie consent mechanism despite ad usage. Privacy and terms pages exist but are basic. Overall, the site provides valuable functionality but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets web developers and IT professionals needing quick and easy .htaccess file generation. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a free, comprehensive toolset with multiple features under a consistent brand. Revenue streams are primarily advertising and affiliate marketing, notably with SEMrush. The site has a modest market position as a niche utility within the web development tools sector. The lack of explicit company contact information and WHOIS data limits transparency but the presence of social media and related Dan's Tools sites suggests an established ecosystem. Growth potential depends on enhancing trust and compliance to attract more users and potential premium offerings.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Forms exist but no explicit security measures or input validations are visible. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms despite tracking and advertising scripts indicates partial GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Dan's Tools

Description:

Quickly generate an htaccess file for many functions including www rewrite, hotlink prevention, custom error pages, caching, and redirects.

Key Services:
.htaccess file generationhtpasswd generatorredirectscaching ruleshotlink preventioncustom error pagesIP blockingbot blocking
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 3.4.1jQuery 2.2.4Font Awesome 4.0.3Google AnalyticsGoogle Adsense
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL scheme

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseEzoic
Marketing Tools:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website provides a comprehensive .htaccess file generator tool with multiple features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

83 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(348 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.200.98.251, 34.202.133.59
Name Servers:
ns-1409.awsdns-48.org
ns-1642.awsdns-13.co.uk
ns-224.awsdns-28.com
ns-868.awsdns-44.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a solid technical foundation using Bootstrap 3.4.1 and jQuery 2.2.4, with Font Awesome for icons. It leverages Google Analytics for tracking and Google Adsense/Ezoic for monetization. Assets are partially served via AWS CloudFront CDN, improving performance. The site is mobile responsive with clear navigation and structured forms for various .htaccess configurations. However, the lack of modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance. No CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Overall, the technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website