Skip to main content

Is htpproduction.com a Scam? Security Check Results - HTP production Reviews

htpproduction.com favicon

Is htpproduction.com Safe? Security Analysis for HTP production

Check if htpproduction.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:40:32 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

HTP production is a small manufacturing business based in Latvia specializing in wooden and fiberglass hot tubs. Their website showcases a variety of hot tubs with different assemblies and massage systems, targeting consumers interested in quality outdoor tubs. The company emphasizes consultation, manufacturing, and delivery services. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, hosted on AWS Cloudfront, and uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, Google Analytics, and Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized with good design and navigation, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and clearer business contact information.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudfront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

HTP production operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on niche wooden and fiberglass hot tubs. Their business model appears to be direct sales with a focus on customization and quality. The company leverages social media channels like Facebook and Instagram for marketing and customer engagement. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information on the website limits transparency. The market position is likely regional within Latvia and possibly neighboring countries. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content and gallery indicate a hands-on manufacturing approach with emphasis on craftsmanship. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed, but the presence of a gallery and product descriptions suggest active business operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable hosting and CDN services, which is positive for security. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No forms with sensitive data collection were detected, reducing risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, which is a compliance risk. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, as it may indicate domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in compliance and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

HTP production

Description:

HTP production offers wooden tubs with fiberglass shells and various assemblies and massage systems, from simple to electronically controlled, made in Latvia.

Key Services:
ConsultationManufactureDelivery
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudfront CDN
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfuser.webnode.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(88 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:3.125.172.46, 3.73.27.108
Name Servers:
ns1.register.it
ns2.register.it
MX Records:
10: mta-02.webnode.com
SOA:Serial: 2024072001, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:46ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfuser.webnode.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webnode CMS and hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery and scalability. It uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies, including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS files and images optimized via CDN. Accessibility is basic, with no advanced ARIA roles or accessibility features detected. The lack of security headers and privacy compliance features are technical gaps. No complex frameworks or backend technologies are evident from the front-end analysis. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could be enhanced with better security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website