Skip to main content

Is huarenjiewang.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Sinocom SARL Reviews

S

Is huarenjiewang.com Safe? Security Analysis for Sinocom SARL

Check if huarenjiewang.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherFrancemedium
jQueryGoogle AdsenseGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:45:46 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

华人街分类广告网站由Sinocom SARL运营,主要面向海外华人社区,提供多国家分站的分类广告、论坛、生活服务、新闻及火车票预订等服务。网站通过多语言和多国家子站点布局,覆盖法国、意大利、西班牙、德国、英国等多个国家,体现其国际化运营策略。技术上,网站采用jQuery及Google广告和分析工具,性能表现中等,移动端优化基础,内容结构清晰,用户体验良好。安全方面,网站启用HTTPS但缺少关键安全头,存在改进空间。WHOIS信息缺失,影响域名信任度。整体业务可信度中等,建议加强隐私合规和安全防护以提升用户信任。

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AdsenseGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

华人街通过多国家分站和丰富的社区服务,定位于海外华人市场,利用分类广告和社区论坛构建用户粘性。其商业模式依赖广告收入和本地化服务,合作伙伴包括火车票和新闻服务网站。公司在法国和意大利设有实体办公地址,显示一定规模和正规运营。缺乏公开隐私政策和安全披露,可能影响部分用户信任。未来增长可通过完善合规性和增强技术架构实现。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@huarenjie.com

Phone Numbers (1)

003*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站安全措施基础,启用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,但缺少内容安全策略(CSP)、HSTS等安全头,增加潜在风险。未发现明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,但第三方脚本依赖较多,需定期审计。缺少安全政策和事件响应联系方式,合规性不足。建议补充安全头,完善隐私和安全政策,提升整体安全成熟度。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并配置安全HTTP头(CSP、HSTS、X-Frame-Options等)以防范常见攻击。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sinocom SARL

Description:

华人街分类广告网站,提供多个国家和地区的分类广告分站,主要面向华人社区,提供生活服务、论坛、新闻、火车票等信息。

Key Services:
分类广告论坛社区生活服务信息新闻资讯火车票预订
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AdsenseGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(29 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.19.251, 172.67.190.181
Name Servers:
brianna.ns.cloudflare.com
terry.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2379886905, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:44ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于传统jQuery技术栈,集成Google Adsense和Tag Manager进行广告和数据分析,技术较为成熟但缺乏现代前端框架支持。页面结构清晰,SEO基础良好,但移动端优化和无障碍支持有限。性能表现中等,依赖外部广告和分析服务。缺少CMS信息,可能为定制开发。建议逐步引入现代前端技术和性能优化措施,提升用户体验和维护效率。
Analyze Another Website