Skip to main content

Is huisem.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 恒辉建站工作室 Reviews

恒

Is huisem.com Safe? Security Analysis for 恒辉建站工作室

https://huisem.com

Check if huisem.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
jQuery 2.2.4Z-BlogPHP 1.7.3UEditor Prism.jsFlexsliderHeadroom.js+2 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 1:05:51 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

恒辉建站工作室是一家专注于Z-BlogPHP主题和插件开发的专业服务提供商，提供主题销售、插件定制开发、教程分享及售后工单支持。其市场定位为专业的Z-BlogPHP开发者，面向广大Z-Blog用户和开发者群体。网站内容丰富，设计良好，支持用户注册和登录，具备一定的用户互动和售后服务能力。技术基础基于Z-BlogPHP CMS，采用多种JavaScript库和插件，支持移动端良好响应。安全方面，网站启用了HTTPS，但缺少关键安全头，存在一定安全改进空间。WHOIS信息缺失，影响域名信任度。整体风险中等，建议加强安全配置和隐私合规。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4Z-BlogPHP 1.7.3UEditor Prism.jsFlexsliderHeadroom.jsTheia Sticky SidebarjQuery Cookie

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该网站通过销售Z-BlogPHP主题和插件实现盈利，业务模式为软件产品销售及定制开发。目标客户为Z-BlogPHP用户和开发者，市场竞争中以专业性和定制能力为优势。网站链接多个相关合作伙伴和资源站，形成一定的生态合作网络。缺乏公开的公司注册信息和联系方式，影响业务透明度。内容更新活跃，显示业务持续运营。

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站使用HTTPS保障数据传输安全，但未检测到安全相关HTTP头如CSP、HSTS等，存在潜在安全风险。无明显敏感信息泄露，表单数据收集通过用户注册和工单系统实现，但缺少隐私政策和Cookie同意机制，可能存在合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失降低域名可信度，建议完善安全策略和合规措施。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并配置安全HTTP头（CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options等）以提升防护能力

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

恒辉建站工作室

Description:

提供专业的Z-Blog主题、插件定制开发服务，分享Z-Blog教程、主题、插件资源，支持用户提交需求和售后工单服务。

Key Services:
Z-BlogPHP主题销售插件销售插件和主题定制开发教程分享售后工单支持
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4Z-BlogPHP 1.7.3UEditor Prism.jsFlexsliderHeadroom.jsTheia Sticky SidebarjQuery Cookie
Frameworks:
Z-BlogPHP
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(283 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:101.200.192.164
Name Servers:
dns13.hichina.com
dns14.hichina.com
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:396ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于Z-BlogPHP 1.7.3版本，采用jQuery 2.2.4及多种前端插件如Flexslider、Headroom.js等，技术栈较为传统但稳定。页面结构清晰，支持移动端响应。性能表现中等，未见明显加载瓶颈。缺少现代安全头和隐私合规机制，存在技术债务。建议升级技术栈，增强安全和合规性，提升整体技术成熟度。
Analyze Another Website