Skip to main content

Is hyperbridge.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Hyperbridge Reviews

H

Is hyperbridge.network Safe? Security Analysis for Hyperbridge

Check if hyperbridge.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptVue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage)Nuxt.jsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:49:28 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Hyperbridge is a technology company focused on providing cryptographically secure interoperability solutions for blockchain networks. Their platform offers developer tools such as the ISMP SDK, token gateways, and permissionless relayers, positioning themselves as a secure coprocessor for interoperability in the blockchain ecosystem. The website is professionally designed using modern JavaScript frameworks, notably Nuxt.js, and includes integrations with Google Tag Manager for analytics. The content is targeted primarily at developers and blockchain technology users seeking secure interoperability solutions. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for tech startups, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional technology business with moderate risk due to limited public compliance disclosures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage)Nuxt.jsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Hyperbridge operates in the blockchain interoperability sector, offering a suite of products aimed at enhancing secure communication across multiple blockchain networks. Their business model revolves around providing developer-centric tools and infrastructure components that facilitate permissionless relaying and token bridging. The company leverages partnerships with research entities such as Polytope Labs, as indicated by linked domains. The market positioning is that of a niche technology provider with a focus on security and cryptographic proofs. Revenue streams likely include platform usage fees or token-related services. The target customers are blockchain developers and enterprises requiring secure interoperability. Growth indicators include active developer resources and a roadmap section on the website. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and demonstrates technical maturity through its web infrastructure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which may lead to compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no excessive or suspicious tracking services were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear areas for improvement in compliance and security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Hyperbridge

Description:

Hyperbridge is a coprocessor for cryptographically secure Interoperability.

Key Services:
Secure InteroperabilityPermissionless RelayersToken GatewayMultichain Native TokensISMP SDK
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.js (implied by Nuxt.js usage)Nuxt.jsGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 1748525070, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:47ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary and maintainable front-end architecture. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, which is a standard practice. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance appears moderate based on the use of multiple SVG assets and animations, which may impact load times on slower connections. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The technical stack is appropriate for a technology startup focused on developer tools and blockchain interoperability. Opportunities exist to improve performance and accessibility further.
Analyze Another Website