
Is iab.org Safe? Security Analysis for Internet Architecture Board
Check if iab.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) operates as a key governance and advisory body guiding the technical development of the Internet as a global communication and innovation platform. The website reflects a professional, authoritative presence with clear focus on internet standards, workshops, and publications. It serves a specialized audience including internet engineers, standards bodies, and stakeholders in internet governance. The business model is non-profit and centered on oversight and coordination within the internet technical community. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with no blocking or WAF challenges detected. However, some security headers are missing, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, though cookies are disabled in analytics. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and avoids tracking cookies, enhancing user privacy. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts is noted as an area for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of organization. No suspicious indicators or vulnerabilities were found. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and privacy policies, and implementing cookie consent if cookies are used in the future.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The IAB holds a strong market position as an essential governance entity within the internet standards ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative role and partnerships with organizations like IETF, IRTF, and IANA. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on standards development and coordination. Revenue streams are likely grant or membership based, though not detailed on the site. Target customers are technical experts, policy makers, and internet stakeholders. Growth indicators include active workshops and recent announcements. The partnership ecosystem is robust, linking to multiple related organizations. Operationally, the IAB maintains a lean, focused digital presence emphasizing transparency and community engagement.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security maturity level is moderate to high, with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with no explicit cookie or privacy policies found, though cookies are disabled. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing security contact information. The security culture appears privacy-conscious but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosures. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with room for security posture enhancements.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Internet Architecture Board
The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) guides the Internet's technical development as a global communication and innovation platform.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No cookies tracked (Matomo configured with disableCookies)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin"
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 39 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings