Skip to main content

Is iana.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Reviews

iana.org favicon

Is iana.org Safe? Security Analysis for Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Check if iana.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
jQueryGoogle Custom Search EngineCSS3HTML5
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:48:08 AM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is a critical entity responsible for the global coordination of DNS Root, IP addressing, and other Internet protocol resources. Operated by Public Technical Identifiers (PTI), an affiliate of ICANN, IANA serves as the authoritative source for Internet protocol resource management. The website reflects this authoritative role with clear, technical content aimed at network operators, protocol developers, and the broader Internet community. The business model is non-profit and governmental, focusing on coordination rather than commercial services. Technically, the website employs a straightforward tech stack including jQuery and Google Custom Search Engine, with modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards. The site is moderately performant and mobile-optimized, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are good, with proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the content. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids collecting sensitive user data via forms, which reduces attack surface. However, security headers are not visibly present, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite Google Adsense usage is a minor compliance gap. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, which is unusual for such a critical domain but likely due to query or privacy restrictions rather than malicious intent. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and authoritative with a strong business credibility score. The main risks relate to transparency in domain registration data and minor privacy compliance improvements. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and trust.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle Custom Search EngineCSS3HTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IANA holds a unique market position as the central authority for Internet protocol resource coordination, operated under ICANN's umbrella. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative status and global recognition. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on governance and coordination. Revenue streams are not applicable as it is a non-profit function. Target customers include Internet infrastructure operators, registries, and technical communities. Growth indicators are stable given the essential nature of its services. Partnerships with ICANN and PTI reinforce its ecosystem. Operationally, the website supports transparency and accessibility of critical Internet resources, though it could improve in privacy and security policy disclosures.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data collection points are present, reducing exposure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency in security management. GDPR compliance is partially indicated via privacy policy links but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data transparency is a concern but likely due to privacy or technical reasons. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-commercial informational site but could be enhanced with better headers, policies, and disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Description:

The global coordination of the DNS Root, IP addressing, and other Internet protocol resources is performed as the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions.

Key Services:
DNS Root Zone ManagementIP Address and AS Number CoordinationProtocol Name and Number RegistriesTime Zone Database Management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle Custom Search EngineCSS3HTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://iana.org/)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Marketing Tools:
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 redirect=icann.org
DNS Lookups:0/10
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:tutnr7vw@ag.us.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-ruf@iana.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

90/100
Score

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.iana.org
Issuer:Sectigo RSA Organization Validation Secure Server CA
Valid Until:1/5/2026 (122 days)
SANs:*.iana.org, iana.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(823 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.43.8
AAAA Records:2001:500:88:200::8
Name Servers:
a.iana-servers.net
b.iana-servers.net
c.iana-servers.net
ns.icann.org
MX Records:
10: pechora7.icann.org
10: pechora8.icann.org
10: pechora6.icann.org
10: pechora1.icann.org

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 redirect=icann.org

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple but effective technical stack with jQuery and Google Custom Search Engine integration. The HTML and CSS are modern and valid, supporting good SEO and mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts improving user experience. No CMS or complex frameworks detected, reducing attack surface but potentially limiting scalability. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. Overall, the technical implementation supports the website's informational purpose but has room for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Analyze Another Website