Skip to main content

Is iban.com a Scam? Security Check Results - IBAN.COM Reviews

I

Is iban.com Safe? Security Analysis for IBAN.COM

Check if iban.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
jQuery 3.5.1Bootstrap 4.5.3Font Awesome 4.7.0Google FontsREST & SOAP APIs
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:36:39 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

IBAN.com is a specialized SaaS provider offering international bank account number validation and related banking data services. The company targets businesses and enterprises requiring accurate IBAN validation to reduce financial transaction errors. Their platform supports all official IBAN countries and provides APIs for seamless integration into client systems. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multi-language support, professional design, and trusted client references. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with secure HTTPS and valid SSL certificates. Security practices include cookie consent and secure form handling, though some security headers and incident response details could be improved. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the overall legitimacy is supported by business content and partner relationships. The site is free of adult or questionable content and complies with privacy regulations.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.5.1Bootstrap 4.5.3Font Awesome 4.7.0Google FontsREST & SOAP APIs

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IBAN.com occupies a niche in the financial technology sector, focusing on payment validation and banking data accuracy. Their business model is SaaS with API offerings, serving a global client base including banks and financial institutions. The company leverages partnerships with SWIFT and other banking authorities to license data, enhancing service credibility. The presence of multiple language portals and corporate client logos indicates a well-established market position. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for API access and enterprise solutions. The company emphasizes reducing transaction errors and improving payment success rates, a critical value proposition in finance. Strategic partnerships with data providers and payment networks strengthen their ecosystem and competitive advantage.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS and valid SSL certificates, including regular renewals. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures. Overall, the security maturity is appropriate for the business type but should evolve to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR and NIS2 fully.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

IBAN.COM

Description:

IBAN.com provides Software as a Service (SaaS) solutions designed to validate and calculate International Bank Account Number (IBAN). The platform performs checksum calculations to validate bank accounts and identify bank details including BIC codes and addresses. It supports all official IBAN countries and offers APIs for integration.

Key Services:
IBAN Validation & CalculationBank Suite: Global Banking ValidationSortWare: UK & Ireland bank account validationBIC Validation ServiceAPIs for developers
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.5.1Bootstrap 4.5.3Font Awesome 4.7.0Google FontsREST & SOAP APIs
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with required fields
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 90% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine(90% enforcement)
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:administrator@iban.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:34.89.152.107
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:37ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap 4.5.3 for responsive design, jQuery 3.5.1 for client-side scripting, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site supports multiple languages via subdomains, indicating a scalable internationalization approach. Performance is moderate with asynchronous animations and preconnect hints to external domains. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and enhanced keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from further optimization and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website