Skip to main content

Is ibb.co a Scam? Security Check Results - ImgBB Reviews

ibb.co favicon

Is ibb.co Safe? Security Analysis for ImgBB

Check if ibb.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
jQueryGoogle FontsYandex AdsHTML5CSS3+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 3:59:13 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ImgBB is a free image hosting and sharing service that offers users the ability to upload images with direct links, BBCode, and HTML thumbnails. The platform supports integration solutions for forums and provides API access and plugins for developers. ImgBB operates a freemium business model with Pro subscription plans that offer enhanced features such as no ads, larger file size limits, and unlimited space. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and supports multiple languages, indicating a broad international user base. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts, and integrates Yandex advertising and analytics services. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure upload inputs, but lacks some security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, ImgBB presents as a legitimate and trustworthy service with a solid market position in the image hosting sector.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle FontsYandex AdsHTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ImgBB targets general internet users needing free and easy image hosting solutions, including forum users and developers requiring API access. Its freemium model generates revenue through Pro subscriptions offering enhanced capabilities. The presence of multiple language versions and integration tools suggests a strategy focused on broad accessibility and developer engagement. The use of Yandex advertising and analytics indicates monetization and user behavior tracking strategies. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers may limit direct customer support channels, relying instead on web forms. ImgBB's competitive advantage lies in its simplicity, free tier, and API/plugin offerings, positioning it well in the image hosting market.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact emails are provided. The upload functionality restricts accepted file types, mitigating some risk of malicious uploads. The use of third-party scripts (Yandex Ads and Metrika) introduces potential privacy and security considerations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ImgBB

Description:

Free image hosting and sharing service, upload pictures, photo host. Offers integration solutions for uploading images to forums.

Key Services:
Free image hostingImage uploadingDirect image linksBBCode and HTML thumbnailsAPI accessPlugin integration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle FontsYandex AdsHTML5CSS3JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure file upload input with accepted file types
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Yandex Metrika
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Yandex AdsAdFox
Tracking Pixels:
Yandex Metrika
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zeptomail.net include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

6 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(473 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:45.43.142.0
Name Servers:
ben.ns.cloudflare.com
rita.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mx.zoho.com
20: mx2.zoho.com
50: mx3.zoho.com
SOA:Serial: 2377718476, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:50ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zeptomail.net include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with jQuery, Google Fonts, and asynchronous JavaScript loading. It integrates Yandex advertising and analytics services, which may impact user privacy. The site is mobile-optimized and supports multiple languages, enhancing accessibility and user reach. Performance is moderate, with preconnect hints and font optimizations. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business model effectively but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website