Skip to main content

Is ibcsolar.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ibcsolar.com Reviews

ibcsolar.com favicon

Is ibcsolar.com Safe? Security Analysis for ibcsolar.com

Check if ibcsolar.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis (domain parking/monetization)
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:14:50 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website ww25.ibcsolar.com appears to be a parked domain primarily monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and Bodis. The content is minimal, generic, and focused on solar energy-related keywords without providing substantive business information or services. The lack of WHOIS registration data and the use of a subdomain prefix 'ww25' are common indicators of domain parking or placeholder status rather than an active commercial website. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no modern frameworks or CMS detected. There is no HTTPS enabled, and no security headers are present, resulting in a weak security posture. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic and lack consent mechanisms. No contact information, social media links, or business credentials are provided, limiting trust and credibility.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis (domain parking/monetization)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site targets the energy sector, specifically solar energy solutions, but does not present any identifiable company or business entity. There is no evidence of a business model beyond domain monetization through ads. The absence of contact details, certifications, or legal business information suggests this is not an operational business website. The domain's lack of WHOIS data and minimal content further indicate it may be held for resale or ad revenue rather than active commercial use. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no visible security policies or incident response contacts. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing some risk, but the overall lack of security best practices and transparency is concerning. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or malware, but the minimal technical implementation and missing SSL are critical issues. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

See relevant content for ibcsolar.com

Key Services:
solar energy solutionssolar panel installationrenewable energy servicesphotovoltaic systemsresidential solar power
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis (domain parking/monetization)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is primarily a parked domain with advertising content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

NIS2 requires appropriate technical measures including encryption

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fdcf:abda:4154::/48 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

No HTTPS Encryption

CRITICAL

Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(221 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.224.182.252
Name Servers:
230.ns1.above.comWHOIS only
230.ns2.above.comWHOIS only
ns1.abovedomains.comDNS only
ns2.abovedomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: park-mx.above.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:209ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fdcf:abda:4154::/48 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and relies on third-party advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Bodis. There is no CMS or modern web framework detected. Performance is moderate but limited by the minimal content and external ad scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features or ARIA roles detected. SEO is minimal, relying on meta description and keywords embedded in ad iframe parameters rather than structured data or rich snippets. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a significant technical and security deficiency.
Analyze Another Website