Skip to main content

Is ibfoodtech.com a Scam? Security Check Results - IB FOODTECH Reviews

I

Is ibfoodtech.com Safe? Security Analysis for IB FOODTECH

Check if ibfoodtech.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
JavaScriptFacebook PixelPlausible Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:50:46 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

IB FOODTECH is a Latvian-based food technology consulting and training company with over 15 years of experience in the food and beverage production sector. The company targets small and medium-sized food producers, cafes, restaurants, schools, kindergartens, and mobile caterers in Latvia, offering specialized services including compliance with international food safety standards such as ISO 22000, BRC GS, and FSSC 22000. Their business model focuses on B2B service delivery, supporting clients in business startup and development phases with documentation, training, and ongoing consultation. Technically, the website is built on the Webador CMS platform and employs modern JavaScript libraries, Facebook Pixel for marketing, and Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, some SEO and accessibility improvements could be made. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to boost trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptFacebook PixelPlausible Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IB FOODTECH occupies a niche market in Latvia, providing essential food technology consulting and training services to a diverse client base within the food production and catering sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive industry experience and certifications aligned with international food safety standards. The company leverages social media and digital marketing tools to engage with clients and promote services. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting contracts, training programs, and certification assistance. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with certification bodies and digital platform providers like Webador. Growth indicators include the addition of online hygiene training and active social media presence. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding digital presence and formalizing compliance documentation to enhance market credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@ibfoodtech.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712666****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the IB FOODTECH website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking but is balanced by the use of Plausible Analytics, a privacy-conscious tool. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting trust and domain legitimacy. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and clearer compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

IB FOODTECH

Description:

Pārtikas tehnologu komanda ar vairāk kā 15 gadu pieredzi, sniedz kvalitatīvus pārtikas tehnologu pakalpojumus mājražotājiem, kafejnīcām, restorāniem, ražotnēm, skolām un bērnudārziem Latvijā.

Key Services:
Pārtikas tehnologu pakalpojumiApmācībasStarptautisko standartu konsultācijas (ISO 22000, BRC GS, FSSC 22000)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptFacebook PixelPlausible Analytics
Platforms:
Webador CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook PixelPlausible Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.webador.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(150 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:35.204.150.5
Name Servers:
ns1.openprovider.nl
ns2.openprovider.be
ns3.openprovider.eu
MX Records:
0: mail.webador.com
SOA:Serial: 2023011901, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:171ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.webador.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on the Webador CMS platform, leveraging JavaScript frameworks and third-party services such as Facebook Pixel and Plausible Analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes basic SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no significant loading delays detected. The technical stack is modern but lacks advanced security configurations such as HTTP security headers. The site uses JSON-LD structured data for organization information, enhancing search engine understanding. There is an opportunity to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and security posture to reduce technical debt and enhance operational resilience.
Analyze Another Website