Skip to main content

Is ibsad.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 瑞丽美容网 Reviews

ibsad.com favicon

Is ibsad.com Safe? Security Analysis for 瑞丽美容网

Check if ibsad.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareChinamedium
jQuery 1.5.2jQuery 2.1.1JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 4:12:44 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

瑞丽美容网是一家专注于医疗美容整形信息服务的中文网站,提供丰富的整形项目介绍、整形医院信息、在线咨询服务及最新整形新闻。网站覆盖全国多个城市,拥有多个合作医院的子域名,体现其在医疗美容行业的广泛合作网络。技术上,网站采用传统的jQuery库和Destoon CMS,性能表现中等,移动端优化基础。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺少DNSSEC和安全头部,且未见隐私或Cookie政策的完善,存在一定合规风险。WHOIS信息显示域名注册日期异常,可能为数据错误,但域名状态保护良好。整体来看,网站内容丰富且专业,适合目标用户群体,但在安全和隐私合规方面有提升空间。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.5.2jQuery 2.1.1JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

瑞丽美容网定位为医疗美容整形信息平台,主要通过提供整形项目和医院信息、在线咨询及推广服务实现商业价值。其覆盖全国多个城市,拥有多家合作医院子站,显示其较强的市场渗透力和合作生态。网站内容更新频繁,体现活跃的运营状态。商业模式以信息服务和广告推广为主,目标客户为整形美容需求者和相关医疗机构。缺乏公开的联系方式和安全政策可能影响用户信任和合规性。

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站启用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,但未启用DNSSEC,存在DNS层面风险。页面未见安全相关HTTP头部,可能增加XSS、点击劫持等风险。未检测到安全事件响应或漏洞披露机制,缺乏安全文化体现。WHOIS信息异常可能影响域名信任度。建议加强安全头部配置,完善隐私和Cookie政策,启用DNSSEC,并建立漏洞响应流程以提升整体安全成熟度。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以提升域名解析安全性

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

瑞丽美容网

Description:

瑞丽美容网是一个权威医疗美容整形网站,提供专业的微整形、眼部整形、鼻部整形、面部整形、胸部整形、牙齿整形、激光美白、除皱祛斑等美容项目及整形专家和整形医院在线咨询,分享真实的整形案例效果,提供最新的整形价格查询服务。

Key Services:
整形项目介绍整形医院信息在线咨询整形案例分享价格查询推广及广告服务
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.5.2jQuery 2.1.1JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
百度站长推送 (zz.bdstatic.com)
Tracking Pixels:
百度站长推送脚本
Marketing Tools:
推广链接积分换礼
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese medical cosmetic surgery information platform.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(175 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.41.80.20
Name Servers:
ns1.judns.comWHOIS only
ns1.julydns.comDNS only
ns2.judns.comWHOIS only
ns2.julydns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1749841380, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:220ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于传统的jQuery库和Destoon CMS构建,技术栈较为陈旧但稳定。页面结构清晰,SEO优化良好,内容丰富。性能表现中等,移动端优化基础。存在多版本jQuery并存,可能带来维护复杂度和安全风险。缺乏现代前端框架和安全最佳实践的应用。建议逐步升级技术栈,优化性能和安全配置,提升整体技术现代化水平。
Analyze Another Website