Skip to main content

Is ic3.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) Reviews

ic3.gov favicon

Is ic3.gov Safe? Security Analysis for Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)

Check if ic3.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
USWDS (U.S. Web Design System)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:20:28 PM
78
Security Score
LOW RISK

AI Summary

The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is an official U.S. government website operated by the FBI, serving as the central hub for reporting cyber-enabled crimes. It provides a secure platform for the public and industry to file complaints, access alerts, and obtain resources related to cybercrime. The website is well-branded with consistent FBI and government identity elements, reinforcing its authority and trustworthiness. The target audience includes victims of cybercrime, law enforcement, and private sector partners. Technically, the site employs modern web standards and the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) framework, ensuring accessibility, mobile responsiveness, and a professional user experience. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced, SSL encryption on forms, and content security policies implemented. However, the site lacks an explicit cookie consent mechanism and a dedicated security policy page, which are areas for improvement. From a security posture perspective, the site demonstrates strong practices with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to .gov domain privacy restrictions, which is typical and justified for government domains. The domain expiry date aligns with official management, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site scores highly on trust, security, and content quality, making it a reliable resource for cybercrime reporting. Strategic recommendations include implementing a cookie consent banner to enhance privacy compliance, publishing a clear security policy or incident response page, and adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust. These steps will further strengthen the site's compliance and security posture.

Detected Technologies

USWDS (U.S. Web Design System)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IC3 occupies a unique position as a government-operated cybercrime reporting center, leveraging the FBI's authority and resources. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on public safety and law enforcement collaboration rather than commercial revenue. The site supports a broad ecosystem including victims, private sector entities, and law enforcement agencies. Its partnership with the FBI and DOJ enhances its credibility and operational reach. The presence of industry alerts and public service announcements indicates active engagement with stakeholders. The lack of commercial advertising and affiliate programs aligns with its government mission. Growth indicators include expanding complaint volumes and increasing reported losses, highlighting its critical role in national cybersecurity efforts.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

202*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, SSL encryption on complaint forms, and implementation of content security policies using Trusted Types. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. There is no evidence of GDPR non-compliance, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be a compliance gap. Incident response readiness is implied through FBI affiliation but not explicitly documented. Overall, the site is secure and trustworthy but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)

Description:

The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is the central hub for reporting cyber-enabled crime, operated by the FBI, the lead federal agency for investigating crime.

Key Services:
Cybercrime complaint intakePublic service announcementsIndustry alertsResources and outreach
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
USWDS (U.S. Web Design System)JavaScriptHTML5CSS3
Frameworks:
USWDS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • SSL encryption on forms
  • Content Security Policy with Trusted Types
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
DigitalGov Universal Federated AnalyticsGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official U.S. government website with .gov domain

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:smtp.ic3.gov mx exp=spf-exp.ic3.gov -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1360-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@ic3.gov
Forensic Reports:postmaster@ic3.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.ic3.gov
Issuer:GeoTrust TLS RSA CA G1
Valid Until:2/12/2026 (159 days)
SANs:www.ic3.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(339 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:20.141.170.64, 52.126.48.246
AAAA Records:2001:489a:3102:6::62, 2001:489a:3600::13
Name Servers:
ns1-35.azuregov-dns.us
ns2-35.azuregov-dns.us
ns3-35.azuregov-dns.us
ns4-35.azuregov-dns.us
MX Records:
10: mail1.ic3.gov
25: mail2.ic3.gov
SOA:Serial: 1000, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:150ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:smtp.ic3.gov mx exp=spf-exp.ic3.gov -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses the U.S. Web Design System (USWDS) framework, ensuring compliance with government web standards for accessibility and usability. It employs modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip navigation links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the site is served over HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. No CMS or third-party content management system was detected, suggesting a custom or government-managed platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and appropriate for a government service website.
Analyze Another Website