Skip to main content

Is icentrs.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - iCentrs Reviews

icentrs.lv favicon

Is icentrs.lv Safe? Security Analysis for iCentrs

Check if icentrs.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
WordPressWooCommerceElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:41:55 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

iCentrs is a Latvian-based small business specializing in fast repair services for computers, phones, and other smart devices, with a strong focus on Apple products. The company has over a decade of experience and offers operational repair services, including onsite device pickup and return. Their market position is that of a trusted local specialist with a professional online presence and clear contact channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks some security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies, indicating room for compliance improvement. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, serving its target audience effectively.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelreCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology repair sector, targeting individual and business customers needing device repairs, especially Apple users. Their business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement via contact forms and onsite services. The company leverages social media for brand presence and uses standard digital marketing tools. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a compliance gap that could affect customer trust. The company appears to be independent with no parent or subsidiary companies mentioned. Their partnership with eSolutions, SIA (likely a web development or hosting provider) is evident. Growth indicators include a decade-long experience and specialization in a niche market segment.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@icentrs.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712203****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

eSolutions, SIA

VAT Number:

LV40203284362

Registration Number:

40203284362

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA on forms, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicates limited transparency in security governance. The use of third-party scripts (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel) introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and formal policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

iCentrs

Description:

Datoru, telefonu un citu viedierīču ātrs remonts. Lielu daļu remontu veicam operatīvi, stundas laikā. Laicīgi piesakoties, sarežģītāki remonti dienas laikā.

Key Services:
Phone repairTablet repairComputer repairApple product specialization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelreCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
WooCommerceElementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.178.39 include:icentrs.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:35.227.194.51, 34.120.190.48, 34.160.81.203, 35.190.31.54
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.netDNS only
ns2.siteground.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx10.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
20: mx20.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
30: mx30.antispam.mailspamprotection.com
SOA:Serial: 89, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:35.214.178.39 include:icentrs.lv.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack using WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Elementor for page building. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and security headers. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb information, aiding search engine visibility. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy compliance require attention.
Analyze Another Website