Is icom.museum Safe? Security Analysis for International Council of Museums
Check if icom.museum is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The International Council of Museums (ICOM) operates as a global non-profit organization dedicated to supporting museums and museum professionals worldwide. It provides a comprehensive network facilitating events, training, research, and heritage protection initiatives. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and a broad range of resources aimed at museum professionals and cultural heritage stakeholders. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics integrations, ensuring a functional and user-friendly experience. Security measures such as HTTPS and reCAPTCHA are in place, though enhancements like DNSSEC and additional security headers could further strengthen the posture. Overall, the domain registration and website content align well, indicating a legitimate and trustworthy entity.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
ICOM holds a strong market position as the authoritative international body for museums, offering key services including conferences, training programs, publications, and advocacy. Its business model centers on membership and professional development within the cultural heritage sector. The organization targets museum professionals, researchers, and cultural institutions globally. The website's extensive content and structured navigation support its role as a knowledge hub. Partnerships and social media presence enhance its ecosystem, while the domain's long registration history supports its credibility.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and clientTransferProhibited domain status. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some common security headers suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response information is a gap in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced DNS security.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall DNS security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
International Council of Museums
A global organisation and a network of museums & museum professionals committed to the promotion and protection of cultural heritage
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for forms
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a professional, multilingual WordPress site for an international non-profit museum organization.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No SPF record found
HIGHSPF helps prevent email spoofing
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 82 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Invalid SPF Record
MEDIUMSPF record syntax is invalid
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings