Skip to main content

Is idealgas.it a Scam? Security Check Results - idealgas.it Reviews

I

Is idealgas.it Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if idealgas.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:32:04 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website idealgas.it currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) protection, specifically a BitNinja security check. The domain is well-established, registered since 1998, and DNSSEC is enabled, which are positive indicators of legitimacy. However, the visible content is minimal and outdated, referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5 CMS versions, both of which are obsolete and vulnerable to security threats. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, nor is there any contact or business information visible on the page. This limits the ability to assess the business model or services offered. The website's technical implementation is basic with poor design quality and minimal SEO or accessibility features.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the content being blocked by a security challenge, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain age suggests a longstanding presence, but the lack of visible business information, contact details, or policies reduces credibility. The presence of BitNinja as a security partner indicates some investment in security infrastructure. No external business-related domains or partnerships are evident beyond the security provider. The business sector and model cannot be confidently determined from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture shows mixed signals. On one hand, DNSSEC is enabled and a WAF (BitNinja) is active, which are positive security controls. On the other hand, the use of outdated CMS versions with known vulnerabilities and the absence of visible security headers or policies indicate significant security risks. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. The security challenge page restricts full content access, which may hinder user experience but also protects the site from automated attacks. Overall, the security maturity appears low to moderate with room for significant improvement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all CMS platforms to their latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security challenge page with a redirect and BitNinja security check, indicating WAF protection and content blocking.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:outbound.mailhop.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(218 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:86.107.32.93
Name Servers:
ns1.dnshigh.comDNS only
ns2.dnshigh.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: idealgas-it.mail.protection.outlook.com
10: mail01.idealgas.it
20: mx02.idealgas.it
SOA:Serial: 2025060401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:320ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:outbound.mailhop.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses very outdated CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which are no longer supported and pose security risks. The HTML content is minimal and primarily serves as a security challenge page with JavaScript-based redirect and browser integrity checks. No modern analytics, tracking, or marketing tools are detected. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. DNSSEC is enabled, which is a positive DNS security measure. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears outdated and in need of modernization to improve performance, security, and user experience.
Analyze Another Website