Skip to main content

Is identitypxl.app a Scam? Security Check Results - identitypxl.app Reviews

I

Is identitypxl.app Safe? Security Analysis for identitypxl.app

Check if identitypxl.app is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
ReactGoogle Adsense
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:31:04 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website identitypxl.app/lander is currently a minimal placeholder or parking page with no meaningful content or business information. It appears to be using React for rendering but only outputs an empty root div. The site includes a Google Adsense script, indicating some intent for monetization, but lacks any visible services, descriptions, or contact details. The domain's WHOIS data is privacy protected, and no registrant information is available to verify legitimacy or business claims. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks but lacks SEO, accessibility, and security best practices. There is no HTTPS or security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the site is not currently functioning as a legitimate business website and appears to be inactive or parked.

Detected Technologies

ReactGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of any business content, contact information, or company details, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain is privacy protected and shows no signs of active business operations or market positioning. There are no indications of target audience, business model, or industry sector. The presence of Google Adsense suggests a possible future monetization plan, but currently, the site does not serve any business purpose.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is very weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL configuration, no security headers, and no incident response or security policies published. The site does not collect user data or have forms, reducing attack surface, but the lack of basic security controls and transparency is concerning. The privacy protected WHOIS data combined with minimal content raises questions about legitimacy and trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected due to lack of content, but the overall security maturity is low.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a valid HTTPS certificate to secure the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website content is minimal and appears to be a parking or placeholder page with no meaningful content, indicating possible blocking or unavailability.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactGoogle Adsense
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal parking or placeholder page with no meaningful content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.130.190, 15.197.148.33
Name Servers:
ns29.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns30.domaincontrol.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025050606, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:111ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses React framework and loads scripts from img1.wsimg.com, a known parking/static content host. The HTML is minimal with no meta tags, no SEO optimization, and no accessibility features. Performance is moderate due to minimal content but user experience is poor. The site lacks any CMS or platform indications and appears to be a placeholder. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking beyond Google Adsense. The technical debt is high as the site is not functional for business purposes and requires significant development to become a legitimate website.
Analyze Another Website