Skip to main content

Is iep-qaa.org a Scam? Security Check Results - European University Association Reviews

iep-qaa.org favicon

Is iep-qaa.org Safe? Security Analysis for European University Association

Check if iep-qaa.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationBelgiummedium
jQueryBootstrapGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotjVectorMap
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:05:28 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Institutional Evaluation Programme (IEP), operated by the European University Association, provides quality assurance and institutional evaluation services primarily targeting higher education institutions. The organization is well-established with a domain age consistent with its operational history since 2017. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of services, testimonials, and recognized certifications such as EQAR and ENQA membership, positioning it as a reputable entity in the education sector. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and HubSpot, and is hosted by Combell, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though improvements in security headers and DNSSEC could enhance protection. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and provides comprehensive contact information, supporting a strong business credibility profile.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotjVectorMap

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IEP operates in the education sector, focusing on institutional evaluation and quality assurance. Its business model is non-profit, serving universities and quality assurance agencies globally, with over 460 evaluations conducted worldwide. The organization leverages partnerships with European quality assurance bodies, enhancing its market position. Revenue streams likely include evaluation services and consultancy. The target audience includes higher education institutions seeking strategic leadership development and quality assurance. The website's content and certifications reflect a strong commitment to quality and compliance, supporting growth and trust in the sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@iep-qaa.org

Phone Numbers (1)

+4122552****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and DNSSEC reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and HubSpot is managed with consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR compliance. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly found, suggesting areas for improvement in transparency and readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

European University Association

Description:

IEP supports institutions in developing their strategic leadership and capacity to manage change.

Key Services:
Institutional evaluationsQuality assurance supportStrategic leadership development
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapGoogle AnalyticsHubSpotjVectorMap
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and maintained.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.flexmail.eu include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:27093621.spf05.hubspotemail.net include:servers.mcsv.net a:mail.eua.eu a:euaonline.eua.be ip4:23.23.239.161 ip4:194.183.247.34 ip4:185.47.28.43 ip4:81.82.198.126 ip4:37.72.163.83 i p4:185.47.28.43 ip4:185.111.196.140 -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(147 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:109.69.190.59
Name Servers:
ns1.combell.euWHOIS only
ns1.european-server.euDNS only
ns3.combell.netWHOIS only
ns3.european-server.comDNS only
ns4.combell.netWHOIS only
ns4.european-server.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: iepqaa-org0i.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1709912484, TTL: 40000s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:145ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.flexmail.eu include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:27093621.spf05.hubspotemail.net include:servers.mcsv.net a:mail.eua.eu a:euaonline.eua.be ip4:23.23.239.161 ip4:194.183.247.34 ip4:185.47.28.43 ip4:81.82.198.126 ip4:37.72.163.83 i p4:185.47.28.43 ip4:185.111.196.140 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, ensuring responsive design and compatibility across devices. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and HubSpot provides robust analytics and marketing capabilities. Hosting by Combell indicates a reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses a custom cookie consent bar, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively but can benefit from security and performance enhancements.
Analyze Another Website