Skip to main content

Is ietf.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Internet Engineering Task Force Reviews

I

Is ietf.org Safe? Security Analysis for Internet Engineering Task Force

Check if ietf.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Bootstrap (navbar, buttons)Matomo analyticsJavaScript ES6 modulesCSS with custom fonts (Inter)Cloudflare (implied by challenge script)
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 5:47:59 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) is a globally recognized non-profit organization dedicated to developing and promoting voluntary Internet standards, particularly those related to the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP). The website reflects the organization's authoritative position in the technology sector, providing extensive resources, documentation, and event information to a specialized audience of Internet engineers, developers, and researchers. The business model is community-driven and supported by donations and sponsorships, emphasizing openness and collaboration.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap (navbar, buttons)Matomo analyticsJavaScript ES6 modulesCSS with custom fonts (Inter)Cloudflare (implied by challenge script)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IETF holds a leading market position as the premier Internet standards body, with a strong ecosystem of partners including the RFC Editor, IANA, IAB, and IRTF. The organization leverages a transparent and open process for standards development, supported by a medium-sized operational structure. Its revenue streams likely include sponsorships and donations, with a focus on sustaining an open Internet. The website's comprehensive content and clear navigation support its role as a central hub for Internet standards information and community engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and employs privacy-conscious analytics (Matomo with disabled cookies), indicating a mature security posture. However, the absence of visible security headers and explicit security policies or incident response contacts suggests areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and security.txt file are notable compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Internet Engineering Task Force

Description:

The IETF is the premier Internet standards organization that develops and promotes voluntary Internet standards, particularly the standards that comprise the Internet protocol suite (TCP/IP). It works on a broad range of networking technologies foundational to the Internet's growth and evolution.

Key Services:
Development and publication of RFCs (Request for Comments)Organization of meetings and hackathonsProviding tools and resources for participation in Internet standards development
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap (navbar, buttons)Matomo analyticsJavaScript ES6 modulesCSS with custom fonts (Inter)Cloudflare (implied by challenge script)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap 5
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

62/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:166.84.6.31 ip4:166.84.7.238 ip6:2602:f977:800:f7f6::/64 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.hostedrt.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:ietf.org
Issuer:E8
Valid Until:12/14/2025 (72 days)
SANs:*.ietf.org, ietf.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(159 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.16.45.99, 104.16.44.99
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6810:2c63, 2606:4700::6810:2d63
Name Servers:
jill.ns.cloudflare.com
ken.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: mail2.ietf.org
SOA:Serial: 2384835751, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:26ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:166.84.6.31 ip4:166.84.7.238 ip6:2602:f977:800:f7f6::/64 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.hostedrt.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, Matomo for privacy-focused analytics, and custom fonts for branding consistency. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with fast loading times and clear navigation. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Opportunities exist to improve technical SEO and implement additional security headers to reduce risk.
Analyze Another Website