Skip to main content

Is ievassalons.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Ievas Salons Reviews

ievassalons.lv favicon

Is ievassalons.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Ievas Salons

Check if ievassalons.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCloudfront CDNWebnode platform
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:31:27 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ievas Salons is a small local beauty salon business based in Ogre, Latvia, specializing in beauty care, cosmetics, and personal hygiene services. The website presents clear contact information, including phone, email, and physical address, and maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Draugiem.lv. The business model is focused on appointment-based services for local customers. The website is built on the Webnode platform and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure and digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner implemented; however, additional security headers and privacy policies are lacking, which could be improved to enhance compliance and trust. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust assessment. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and safe for general audiences.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCloudfront CDNWebnode platform

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector, specifically in beauty and personal care services, targeting local customers in Latvia. The business leverages social media platforms for marketing and customer engagement. The website does not feature e-commerce capabilities, focusing instead on service promotion and contact facilitation. The lack of detailed business registration information and privacy policies suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital compliance maturity. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its local presence and direct customer contact. Growth indicators are not evident from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712911****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, security.txt, and comprehensive security headers reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site does not collect sensitive user data via forms, minimizing risk exposure. Incident response and data protection officer information are not provided, indicating limited formal security governance. Enhancing security headers and publishing privacy and security policies would improve compliance and trustworthiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to meet GDPR and user trust requirements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ievas Salons

Description:

Skaistumkopšana, kosmētika un personīgā higiēna (Beauty care, cosmetics and personal hygiene)

Key Services:
Beauty careCosmeticsPersonal hygiene services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptCloudfront CDNWebnode platform
Platforms:
Webnode CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:3.125.172.46, 3.73.27.108
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1705417867, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:370ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform and served via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable hosting and content delivery. The site uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies with responsive design for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with no significant loading delays observed. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but could be improved with structured data and richer metadata. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Analyze Another Website