Skip to main content

Is ifcradios.com a Scam? Security Check Results - IFC Radios and Safety Reviews

ifcradios.com favicon

Is ifcradios.com Safe? Security Analysis for IFC Radios and Safety

Check if ifcradios.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailN/asmall
WordPressWooCommerceDivi ThemeCleanTalk Anti-SpamGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 6:38:22 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

IFC Radios and Safety operates an e-commerce website specializing in radios and safety equipment. The business appears to be small-sized, founded around 2013, and uses WordPress with WooCommerce and the Divi theme for its online presence. The website's content is basic but relevant to its business focus, targeting a general audience interested in safety products. Technical infrastructure includes common WordPress plugins such as CleanTalk for anti-spam and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Hosting is provided by LiquidNet Ltd., with a domain registration consistent with the business age and no privacy protection, indicating transparency in ownership. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and anti-spam measures, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no published security or privacy policies were found. Overall, the website is functional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and improved privacy compliance to increase trust and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceDivi ThemeCleanTalk Anti-SpamGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself in the retail sector, focusing on safety and communication equipment. Its business model is e-commerce, selling products directly to consumers. The website lacks detailed business information such as contact details, certifications, or trust signals, which limits its competitive advantage and market transparency. The absence of social media links and partner domains suggests a limited partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the website content. The company could improve by publishing comprehensive policies and contact information to enhance credibility and customer trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@ifcradios.com

Phone Numbers (2)

480*******
480*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of an anti-spam plugin. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident, which could delay response to security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also raises compliance concerns, particularly regarding GDPR. The domain registration is stable and trustworthy, but technical security enhancements are recommended to mitigate risks and improve overall security posture.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

IFC Radios and Safety

Description:

Your Safety is Our Passion

Key Services:
Sales of radios and safety equipment
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceDivi ThemeCleanTalk Anti-SpamGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WooCommerceDivi
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk) active

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
CleanTalk pixel
Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress WooCommerce store selling radios and safety equipment.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(933 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:198.23.51.26
Name Servers:
dns1.3rdstwebhosting.com
dns2.3rdstwebhosting.com
dns3.3rdstwebhosting.com
dns4.3rdstwebhosting.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1738094790, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:44ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and the Divi theme for design. It leverages Google Fonts and CleanTalk anti-spam services. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin, indicating some attention to search engine visibility. Hosting is through LiquidNet Ltd., a known registrar and hosting provider. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved accessibility features.
Analyze Another Website