Skip to main content

Is ifengimg.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 怡丰联合(北京)科技有限责任公司 Reviews

Is ifengimg.com Safe? Security Analysis for 怡丰联合(北京)科技有限责任公司

Check if ifengimg.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaChinalarge
jQueryeasySliderFlash (legacy)JavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 9:16:53 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website ifengimg.com is a Chinese media photo and news portal operated under the Phoenix New Media brand, a well-established media company founded in 2010. It offers curated photojournalism content across various news categories targeting a broad Chinese-speaking audience. The business model centers on media content publishing and advertising, with partnerships such as the National Geographic China photography contest enhancing its content offerings. Technically, the site uses legacy and modern JavaScript libraries but shows signs of technical debt with Flash usage and lacks modern security features like HTTPS enforcement and DNSSEC. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and no cookie consent mechanisms, indicating partial compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality and navigation but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Detected Technologies

jQueryeasySliderFlash (legacy)JavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Phoenix New Media holds a strong market position in Chinese digital media, leveraging its brand recognition and diverse content offerings. The site targets general news consumers interested in photojournalism and current events. Revenue likely derives from advertising and content partnerships. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with multiple related domains and partner collaborations. Growth opportunities exist in enhancing technical infrastructure and compliance with global privacy standards. The partnership with National Geographic China indicates strategic content alliances that add value and credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@ifeng.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers exposes the site to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and clickjacking risks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could increase DNS spoofing risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, limiting transparency. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which may lead to non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity level is basic, requiring focused improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all site traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

怡丰联合(北京)科技有限责任公司

Description:

凤凰网图片频道,提供新闻图片资讯,涵盖社会、财经、娱乐、体育、时尚等多个领域,面向广大中文互联网用户。

Key Services:
news image contentphotojournalismmedia advertising
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryeasySliderFlash (legacy)JavaScriptCSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
wrating analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
wrating.com
Marketing Tools:
wrating analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a Chinese media news and photo content portal under Phoenix New Media.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

100 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(600 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:82.156.59.186
Name Servers:
ns3.dnsv5.com
ns4.dnsv5.com
SOA:Serial: 1668581395, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:122ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a mix of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery and easySlider for UI components. The presence of Flash elements indicates outdated technology that should be phased out. The site lacks mobile optimization beyond basic levels and accessibility features are minimal. SEO optimization is basic with minimal meta keywords and descriptions. Performance is moderate but could be improved by modernizing the tech stack and optimizing assets. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom-built platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports current operations but modernization and security hardening are recommended.
Analyze Another Website