Skip to main content

Is ikauseklis.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Rīgas bērnu un jauniešu centrs “Auseklis” Reviews

ikauseklis.lv favicon

Is ikauseklis.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Rīgas bērnu un jauniešu centrs “Auseklis”

Check if ikauseklis.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviamedium
WordPress 6.7.1PHPjQuery 3.7.1Astra Theme 4.11.1My Calendar plugin+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:36:46 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Rīgas bērnu un jauniešu centrs “Auseklis” is a medium-sized educational and cultural institution based in Riga, Latvia, providing a wide range of extracurricular activities including cultural education, sports, STEM, and creative arts for children and youth. The website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, offering good content quality and user experience. The technical infrastructure is standard for WordPress sites, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present, though a cookie consent mechanism is missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe for general audiences, but WHOIS data is unavailable for domain registration verification due to query limits.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.7.1PHPjQuery 3.7.1Astra Theme 4.11.1My Calendar pluginThe Post Grid plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates as a non-profit educational center focused on youth development in Riga. Its business model revolves around providing diverse extracurricular programs in cultural, sports, social, and STEM fields. The website targets children and youth in the local community, positioning itself as a key local educational resource. The content and navigation are well-structured, supporting the institution's mission. There is no evidence of commercial activities or partnerships from the website data. The absence of WHOIS data limits deeper trust verification, but the site’s content and structure align with a legitimate educational entity.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit security or incident response policies and contact channels, which could improve readiness. Privacy policies are present and GDPR compliance is indicated, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional controls and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Rīgas bērnu un jauniešu centrs “Auseklis”

Description:

Rīgas bērnu un jauniešu centrs “Auseklis” is an educational institution focused on providing cultural, sports, STEM, and creative extracurricular activities for children and youth in Riga, Latvia.

Key Services:
Cultural education and danceVisual and plastic arts, musicSports and physical activitiesSocial and civic educationSTEM, design, and technology clubs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.7.1PHPjQuery 3.7.1Astra Theme 4.11.1My Calendar pluginThe Post Grid plugin
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of standard WordPress security plugins implied

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based educational center site for children and youth in Riga.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:213.175.126.235
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1530703325, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:190ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.1 using the Astra theme and several plugins including My Calendar and The Post Grid. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and standard CSS/JS assets. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, typical for WordPress sites with multiple plugins. No advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags beyond basic canonical and RSS feeds. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a medium-sized educational site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website