Skip to main content

Is impatient.vc a Scam? Security Check Results - Impatient Ventures Reviews

impatient.vc favicon

Is impatient.vc Safe? Security Analysis for Impatient Ventures

Check if impatient.vc is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:33:55 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Impatient Ventures is a technology-focused venture capital firm targeting early-stage startups. The website presents a clean, professional design emphasizing a fast-paced, build-first approach. The business model centers on venture capital investment and portfolio management within the technology sector. The site is built on Webflow with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the website benefits from HTTPS and lacks exposed sensitive data, but it does not implement security headers or provide visible privacy or incident response policies. No contact information or forms are present on the homepage, limiting direct engagement and transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests gaps in compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve its security posture and privacy compliance. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy disclosures, and contact transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Impatient Ventures operates as a niche venture capital firm specializing in early-stage technology startups. Its competitive advantage lies in a clear branding message focused on speed and innovation. The business model relies on investment and portfolio growth, targeting entrepreneurs and investors in the tech ecosystem. The website's minimal content suggests a focus on curated engagement rather than broad marketing. The lack of detailed business information or certifications limits external validation but is typical for small VC firms. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity is basic. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but lacks transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Impatient Ventures

Description:

Impatient Ventures is a technology-focused venture capital firm that invests in early-stage startups. The website emphasizes a fast-paced, build-first approach with the slogan 'MOVE FAST Build THINGS'.

Key Services:
Venture capital fundingStartup portfolio management
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed Webflow site for a venture capital firm.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns1ksz.name.comDNS only
ns2bkr.name.comDNS only
ns3cpr.name.comDNS only
ns4lpv.name.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1658853138, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:62ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Google Fonts and jQuery for frontend functionality. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating moderate digital maturity. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing reliable performance and HTTPS support. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and security features. No forms or interactive elements are present on the homepage, limiting data collection. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and richer content for improved engagement.
Analyze Another Website