Skip to main content

Is imprint.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA imprint Reviews

imprint.lv favicon

Is imprint.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA imprint

Check if imprint.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSlick Slider
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:26:41 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA imprint is a professional printing company based in Riga, Latvia, with over 20 years of experience in the printing industry. They offer a wide range of printing services including digital, offset, and large format printing, catering to both private and corporate clients across Latvia, Scandinavia, and the European Union. Their services include business cards, flyers, booklets, stickers, banners, self-copying forms, stamps, and more, supported by graphic design services. The company emphasizes quality, operational speed, and customer support throughout the order process. Technically, the website is well-structured with modern UI elements and mobile optimization, though it lacks visible advanced security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and contact information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business presence with room for improvement in security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSlick Slider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a reliable and experienced printing service provider with a broad product portfolio and a diverse client base including small workshops, large retail chains, private individuals, and government institutions. Their business model focuses on providing customized printing solutions with fast turnaround times and design support. The market position is strengthened by long-term client relationships and collaborations with advertising agencies and freelancers. The company targets the Latvian and wider European market, emphasizing quality and operational efficiency. No direct competitors or partners are identified from the data. Revenue streams likely derive from printing orders, design services, and expedited production options.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@imprint.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712617****
+3716728****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes a CSRF token, indicating basic security awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA imprint

Description:

Profesionālā tipogrāfija IMPRINT Rīgā. Digitālā, ofseta un lielformāta druka jebkurā sarežģītības pakāpē, sākot no viena eksemplāra. Piegāde visā Latvijā, Skandināvijā un Eiropas Savienībā.

Key Services:
Business cardsFlyers and leafletsBookletsVinyl stickersPaper stickersPVC bannersSelf-copying formsStamps and sealsAdditional printing services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSlick Slider
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • CSRF token present in meta tag

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional printing service based in Riga, Latvia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:213.21.192.0/24 ip4:194.8.8.0/24 ip4:194.8.7.0/24 ip4:213.21.225.56 ip4:213.21.201.243 ~all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:abuse@imprint.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:213.21.201.78
Name Servers:
ns.eunet.lvDNS only
ns2.vernet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.eunet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071000, TTL: 43200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:213.21.192.0/24 ip4:194.8.8.0/24 ip4:194.8.7.0/24 ip4:213.21.225.56 ip4:213.21.201.243 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, utilizing the Slick Slider library for interactive content. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Meta tags and Open Graph tags are properly set for SEO and social sharing. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate based on content size and structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were found, indicating minimal tracking. The lack of security headers and privacy policies are technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy implementations.
Analyze Another Website