Skip to main content

Is imservice99.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - imservice99.eu Reviews

I

Is imservice99.eu Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if imservice99.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 7:52:42 AM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website imservice99.eu is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page which blocks access to any meaningful content or business information. The domain is registered with WebHouse, s.r.o., a legitimate registrar and hosting provider, but no further details about the business or its operations are available. Due to the lack of accessible content, no metadata, structured data, or contact information can be extracted, severely limiting the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or compliance status. Technically, the site shows no detectable technologies or frameworks, and the security posture cannot be evaluated without HTTPS or security headers information. Overall, the site appears inactive or restricted, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence can be derived from the website due to the absence of accessible content. The domain registration indicates a legitimate registrar but provides no insight into the company's market positioning, business model, or partnerships. Without contact details or policies, the business credibility is minimal. There is no evidence of certifications, security policies, or compliance frameworks. The lack of visible business information suggests the site may be under maintenance, restricted, or abandoned.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the blocked content and lack of HTTPS confirmation. The 403 Forbidden error indicates some access control is in place, but no security headers or best practices are observable. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also points to compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity appears low or unknown, with a recommendation to implement HTTPS, security headers, and clear policies once the site is accessible.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.webhouse.sk -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:86.110.243.99
Name Servers:
ns1.webhouse.skDNS only
ns2.webhouse.skDNS only
ns3.webhouse.skDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx1.webhouse.sk
10: mx6.webhouse.sk
10: mx3.webhouse.sk
10: mx5.webhouse.sk
10: mx2.webhouse.sk
10: mx4.webhouse.sk
SOA:Serial: 2024012510, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:132ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.webhouse.sk -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page with a 403 Forbidden status, indicating restricted access. No metadata, scripts, or technologies are detectable. The hosting provider is identified as WebHouse, s.r.o. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Technical modernization and content deployment are necessary to enable proper analysis and user engagement.
Analyze Another Website