Skip to main content

Is indexore.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - AS INDEXO Real Estate Fund Reviews

indexore.lv favicon

Is indexore.lv Safe? Security Analysis for AS INDEXO Real Estate Fund

Check if indexore.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Modern CSS with responsive designSVG graphicsWebP images
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:17:14 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

AS INDEXO Real Estate Fund is an independent real estate investment fund established in late 2022, operating primarily in Riga, Latvia, and managing investments across the Baltic states. The fund focuses on high-quality real estate assets in Baltic capitals and regions, leveraging a team of experienced specialists. The website reflects a professional and focused business model targeting investors interested in Baltic real estate markets. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with responsive design and good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with its business domain.

Detected Technologies

Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Modern CSS with responsive designSVG graphicsWebP images

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates as a niche real estate investment fund in the Baltic region, targeting investors seeking exposure to Baltic real estate markets. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus and experienced management team. The business model centers on fund management and portfolio oversight of real estate assets. The website content and structure support clear communication of investment criteria, portfolio details, and regulatory disclosures, although direct contact information is limited. The absence of social media and external partnerships on the site suggests a focused but potentially limited digital ecosystem. Growth indicators are not explicit, but the recent founding date and professional presentation indicate a startup phase with potential for expansion.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, minimizing attack surface. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security practices are adequate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, transparency, and incident readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AS INDEXO Real Estate Fund

Description:

AS “INDEXO Real Estate Fund” is an independent real estate investment fund established at the end of 2022, operating in Riga, Latvia, managing investments in real estate across the Baltic states. The fund invests in high-quality real estate assets in Baltic capitals and regions, managed by a team of well-known and experienced specialists.

Key Services:
Real estate investment managementPortfolio management in Baltic capitals and regions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Vue.js (Nuxt.js framework)Modern CSS with responsive designSVG graphicsWebP images
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:135.181.93.96
Name Servers:
ns1.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns2.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns3.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
ns4.bdm.microsoftonline.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:305ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. The use of SVG logos and WebP images supports optimized performance and visual quality. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and alternate language links. The CMS appears to be Directus, suggesting a headless CMS approach. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. No server-side or hosting provider information was detected from the HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Analyze Another Website