Skip to main content

Is inetakona.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Ineta Kona Reviews

I

Is inetakona.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Ineta Kona

Check if inetakona.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationLatviasmall
WordPress 6.4.5Google FontsjQuery (implied by WordPress)HTML5CSS3
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:56:29 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website inetakona.lv represents a small-scale personal professional service provider, Ineta Kona, who offers psychological counseling, art education, and personal development workshops primarily targeting Latvian-speaking audiences. The site is built on WordPress and contains a variety of blog posts and service descriptions that reflect a focus on psychology, education, and creative arts. The technical infrastructure is standard for a WordPress site, with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is average with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.4.5Google FontsjQuery (implied by WordPress)HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the education and personal development sector, focusing on psychological support and creative arts. It targets individuals, parents, and educators interested in mental health and artistic expression. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagement through counseling and workshops. The market position is niche and local within Latvia, with no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content is consistent and professional, supporting credibility. However, the absence of formal privacy and security policies and limited digital marketing tools suggest a modest digital maturity level.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

299*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No tracking or analytics services were detected, minimizing privacy risks but also limiting insights into user behavior. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ineta Kona

Description:

The website represents Ineta Kona, an individual professional offering services as an artist, teacher, and psychologist. The content includes blog posts, articles, and information about psychological support, art classes, seminars, and workshops. The business model appears to be service-oriented, focusing on personal development, psychological counseling, and creative education.

Key Services:
Psychological counselingArt classes (academic and expressive)Workshops and seminarsPersonal development coaching
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.4.5Google FontsjQuery (implied by WordPress)HTML5CSS3
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by links)
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal professional site for Ineta Kona, a psychologist, teacher, and artist.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

16 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:192.81.221.34
Name Servers:
ns1.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns2.digitalocean.comDNS only
ns3.digitalocean.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1581945419, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:149ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 with standard themes and scripts, including Google Fonts and WordPress emoji support. The site uses HTML5 and CSS3 with basic mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. No advanced frameworks or third-party marketing or tracking tools are used. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. The site would benefit from performance tuning, enhanced accessibility, and SEO improvements to increase reach and user experience.
Analyze Another Website