Skip to main content

Is infoworld.com a Scam? Security Check Results - InfoWorld Reviews

infoworld.com favicon

Is infoworld.com Safe? Security Analysis for InfoWorld

https://infoworld.com

Check if infoworld.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/alarge
WordPressYoast SEO PremiumGoogle Tag ManagerContentPassNativo+5 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:39:54 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

InfoWorld is a well-established technology media brand providing business technology news, IT product reviews, and enterprise IT strategy insights. It targets enterprise IT professionals, developers, and technology decision makers. The website is part of the Foundry media network, indicating a strong market position within technology publishing. The content is rich, professionally curated, and updated regularly, supporting a large audience with diverse technology interests including AI, cloud computing, and software development. The business model is primarily media and publishing, supported by advertising and affiliate relationships.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO PremiumGoogle Tag ManagerContentPassNativoElasticPressJW PlayerPermutiveGoogle GPT AdsjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

InfoWorld operates in the competitive technology media sector with a focus on enterprise IT and developer audiences. Its competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with Foundry and a broad content offering including articles, videos, newsletters, and events. Revenue streams likely include advertising, sponsored content, and affiliate marketing. The partnership ecosystem includes sister sites like CIO and Computerworld, enhancing cross-promotion and audience reach. The website demonstrates strong digital maturity with integrated consent management and modern advertising technologies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates a consent management platform for GDPR and CCPA compliance, reflecting a mature privacy posture. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no public security policy or incident response contacts are published. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. The use of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing formal security policies and enhancing HTTP security headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

InfoWorld

Description:

Business technology, IT news, product reviews and enterprise IT strategies.

Key Services:
technology newsproduct reviewsenterprise IT strategiesvideosnewslettersevents
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO PremiumGoogle Tag ManagerContentPassNativoElasticPressJW PlayerPermutiveGoogle GPT AdsjQuery
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform integrated
  • Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms
  • External content consent overlays

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Permutive
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google GPTNativoAdnami
Tracking Pixels:
Permutive
Marketing Tools:
ContentPassSourcepoint Consent Manager
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

57/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.infoworld.com._spf.dmarcly.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:6cc97f5d2993594@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
Forensic Reports:6cc97f5d2993594@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 37 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
33 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(431 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.66.100
Name Servers:
boyd.ns.cloudflare.com
kara.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: usb-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: usb-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 2381298338, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_u.infoworld.com._spf.dmarcly.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, ContentPass for paywall/consent, and multiple advertising and analytics integrations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical infrastructure supports a rich content experience with videos, dynamic content loading, and advanced consent overlays. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party scripts and potential performance impacts from advertising technologies.
Analyze Another Website