Skip to main content

Is inksystem.info a Scam? Security Check Results - inksystem.info Reviews

inksystem.info favicon

Is inksystem.info Safe? Security Analysis for inksystem.info

Check if inksystem.info is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Syndicated Search
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:36:51 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website inksystem.info appears to be a minimal content domain primarily serving advertisements and related search results through Bodis and Google Adsense. There is no clear business presence or detailed company information on the site. The WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which combined with the minimal content and use of a 'ww25' subdomain, suggests this domain is likely parked or monetized rather than representing an active legitimate business. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded ad scripts but lacks HTTPS and security headers, indicating a low security posture. Privacy and legal pages exist but are basic and do not demonstrate strong compliance with GDPR or other regulations. Overall, the site has low trustworthiness and minimal business credibility.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Syndicated Search

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain does not present identifiable business intelligence data such as company name, sector, or market position. The business model appears to be domain monetization through advertising networks Bodis and Google Adsense. There are no contact details, certifications, or security policies to indicate a formal business operation. The target audience is general web users who may visit the domain by accident or through redirects. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The lack of content and transparency limits any competitive advantage or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no visible incident response or security policies. The site does not collect user input or personal data, reducing some risk, but the lack of encryption and minimal compliance disclosures are notable gaps. The WHOIS privacy protection without justification and minimal transparency further reduce trust. No vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content, but the overall security maturity is low.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

See relevant content for inksystem.info

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseBodis Syndicated Search
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseBodis
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is minimal and primarily serves ads and related search content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fdcf:abda:4154::/48 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 19 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(84 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:103.224.212.213
Name Servers:
ns1.abovedomains.comDNS only
ns15.abovedomains.comWHOIS only
ns16.abovedomains.comWHOIS only
ns2.abovedomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: park-mx.above.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:161ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fdcf:abda:4154::/48 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with embedded third-party ad scripts from Google Adsense and Bodis. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no HTTPS detected in the provided content. Performance is moderate but limited by minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features or ARIA roles detected. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present.
Analyze Another Website