Skip to main content

Is inoxbolt.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - inoxbolt.lv Reviews

inoxbolt.lv favicon

Is inoxbolt.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Inoxbolt

Check if inoxbolt.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
jQuery 1.6.2Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFancyboxCustom CSS and JS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:57:28 AM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Inoxbolt.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in the sale of stainless steel screws, rivets, anchors, and various construction fastening products. The website serves as an e-commerce and catalog platform targeting construction professionals and businesses requiring durable fastening solutions. The site content is primarily in Latvian and focuses on industrial-grade stainless steel products. Technically, the website uses older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.6.2 and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The design and mobile optimization are basic but functional, with clear navigation and product categorization. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is assumed but no explicit security headers are detected, and the use of outdated libraries presents potential vulnerabilities. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating poor privacy compliance. Contact information is provided via email and phone, but no physical address or detailed company information is available. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and relevant for its niche but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.6.2Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFancyboxCustom CSS and JS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on stainless steel fasteners and construction accessories. Its business model revolves around product sales through an online catalog, targeting local Latvian markets. The website shows moderate branding consistency and trust indicators such as contact details and analytics integration. However, the lack of detailed company information and absence of privacy policies may impact customer trust. The partnership with Norgate.lv for website development is evident. Growth potential exists if the company modernizes its technical stack and enhances compliance and security measures.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

v*****@inoxbolt.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712944****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but no visible security headers like CSP or HSTS. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.6.2) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found. The website lacks advanced security practices and would benefit from a security audit, updating libraries, and implementing security headers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires attention to reduce risk exposure.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Skrūves no nerūsējošā tērauda, dažāda veida kniedes un nerūsējošā tērauda būvstiprinājumi. Montāžas sistēmas un piederumi plašā klāstā pie Inoxbolt.

Key Services:
Sales of stainless steel screwsRivetsConstruction fastenersMounting systems and accessories
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.6.2Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFancyboxCustom CSS and JS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (Google Analytics scripts loaded via https)
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:88.80.190.185
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
50: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 1740050486, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:121ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy jQuery 1.6.2 and custom JavaScript and CSS files. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for tracking. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework indication and appears custom-built. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not discernible from the HTML content. Technical debt is evident due to outdated libraries and missing security best practices.
Analyze Another Website