Skip to main content

Is inplayer.com a Scam? Security Check Results - JW Player Reviews

inplayer.com favicon

Is inplayer.com Safe? Security Analysis for JW Player

Check if inplayer.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle OptimizeCookieYes Consent Management+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:53:03 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

JW Player, operating the InPlayer platform, is a well-established technology company specializing in video monetization solutions including pay per view and OTT live streaming. The company targets content creators, broadcasters, and media companies seeking to monetize video content effectively. The website reflects a mature SaaS business model with a strong market position as a leading paywall and streaming platform provider. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, hosted on AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although some security best practices like security headers and public security policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie and privacy policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and business-focused, with no indications of malicious or adult content.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle OptimizeCookieYes Consent ManagementSelect2WordPress

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

JW Player leverages its long domain history and brand recognition to maintain a strong foothold in the video monetization market. The business model centers on SaaS offerings for pay per view and OTT streaming, generating revenue from content owners and distributors. The company maintains a partner ecosystem including Piksel Group for contact and support services. Marketing efforts are supported by extensive use of analytics and retargeting tools, indicating a data-driven growth strategy. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via web forms and partner sites. The company’s digital presence is consistent and professional, supporting its medium-sized enterprise status in the technology sector.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and employs a detailed cookie consent mechanism that supports GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting external security collaboration. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and publishing security-related policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

JW Player

Description:

Monetize your videos with InPlayer, the world’s leading pay per view & OTT live streaming platform. Grow your revenue with InPlayer.

Key Services:
Video monetizationPay per viewOTT live streamingContent paywall
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle OptimizeCookieYes Consent ManagementSelect2WordPress
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpotGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClickFacebook Ads
Tracking Pixels:
HubSpotLinkedInVimeoYouTube
Marketing Tools:
Google OptimizeHubSpot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 296-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@inplayer.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports@inplayer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Potential Subdomain Takeover

HIGH

Subdomain api.inplayer.com points to unregistered service api-1670745337.eu-west-1.elb.amazonaws.com

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(337 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.5, 52.85.49.118, 52.85.49.58, 52.85.49.119
Name Servers:
ns-1460.awsdns-54.org
ns-1564.awsdns-03.co.uk
ns-202.awsdns-25.com
ns-965.awsdns-56.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:mailgun.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Select2 for UI enhancements. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and HubSpot for marketing and analytics, reflecting a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting is provided via AWS as indicated by DNS servers. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and asynchronous script loading implemented. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. The site uses a cookie consent management platform (CookieYes) for privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and improving accessibility. The site’s technical infrastructure supports business operations effectively with room for modernization in security and accessibility.
Analyze Another Website