Skip to main content

Is inquirygrid.com a Scam? Security Check Results - inquirygrid.com Reviews

I

Is inquirygrid.com Safe? Security Analysis for inquirygrid.com

Check if inquirygrid.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTMLJavaScript
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:17:00 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website inquirygrid.com appears to be a newly registered domain (March 2023) with minimal content primarily consisting of an embedded iframe from an external source. There is no visible business branding, contact information, or policy documentation on the site. The technical infrastructure is basic, with no CMS or modern frameworks detected, and the site lacks standard security headers and DNSSEC. The presence of tracking pixels and obfuscated iframe parameters suggests a focus on data collection or advertising rather than user engagement or service provision. Security posture is weak due to missing headers and DNSSEC, and privacy compliance is poor with no policies found. Overall, the site presents a low trust profile with limited business credibility and poor content quality.

Detected Technologies

HTMLJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No explicit business information, company name, or sector is provided on the website. The domain registration is transparent but lacks registrant details. The site does not disclose any services, target audience, or market positioning. The business model and revenue streams are unclear, and there are no visible partnerships or certifications. The lack of contact details and policies suggests the site may be in early development or used primarily for embedding third-party content or advertising.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include absence of DNSSEC, missing security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS), and use of external iframes with obfuscated parameters that may pose privacy risks. No incident response or security policy information is available. The site uses HTTPS but with basic SSL configuration. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. Overall, the site is at risk of security and privacy issues that could impact users and business reputation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLJavaScript
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
l.cdn-fileserver.com
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly consists of an embedded iframe from an external domain.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

45/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ~

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:208.91.196.46
Name Servers:
ns1.nsresolution.comDNS only
ns2.nsresolution.comDNS only
MX Records:
300: ~
SOA:Serial: 2011062801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:180ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript without any detected CMS or modern frameworks. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. Performance appears slow due to embedded external iframes and tracking scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal. SEO optimization is poor with no meta tags or structured data present. The site lacks modern technical best practices and would benefit from modernization and improved infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website