Skip to main content

Is instabank.no a Scam? Security Check Results - Instabank ASA Reviews

instabank.no favicon

Is instabank.no Safe? Security Analysis for Instabank ASA

Check if instabank.no is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceNorwaymedium
WordPressElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel+7 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 8:54:48 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Instabank ASA is a Norwegian digital bank founded in 2016, offering a range of financial services including loans, credit cards, savings accounts, and insurance products for both private individuals and businesses. The bank positions itself as a modern, fully digital institution focused on simplicity, speed, and security. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by customer testimonials and sponsorships such as Norsk Friidrett. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, integrating multiple analytics and marketing tools while maintaining good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. Overall, Instabank demonstrates a mature digital presence with high trustworthiness and compliance with privacy regulations.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelBing AdsCrazy EggHubSpotOptinMonsterHubSpot Ads PixelLinkedIn Insight TagOMappAPI

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Instabank operates in the competitive Norwegian banking sector, leveraging digital channels to provide accessible financial products. Its business model centers on digital lending and credit solutions, targeting both retail and corporate customers. The company benefits from a clear market position as a modern challenger bank with competitive interest rates and refinancing options. Partnerships and related domains indicate active investor relations and merger activities. The bank's marketing strategy includes extensive use of social media and digital advertising platforms, enhancing customer acquisition and engagement. Growth indicators include a broad product portfolio and visible customer satisfaction through testimonials. The company maintains a transparent and accessible online presence, supporting its credibility and customer trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration, uses cookie consent banners compliant with GDPR, and integrates security plugins such as Wordfence. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Security headers are partially implemented or not explicitly visible, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and explicit security disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and controls.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Instabank ASA

Description:

Heldigitale låne- og kredittløsninger for privatpersoner og bedrifter – raskt, trygt og enkelt. Tilbyr lån med og uten sikkerhet, kredittkort, sparing, forsikring, og bedriftsløsninger som kassekreditt og bedriftslån.

Key Services:
RefinansieringLån med sikkerhetForbrukslånKredittkortSparekontoForsikringBedriftslånKassekreditt
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelBing AdsCrazy EggHubSpotOptinMonsterHubSpot Ads PixelLinkedIn Insight TagOMappAPI
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Wordfence indicated by script)
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/opt-out

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot AnalyticsCrazy EggLinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsBing AdsFacebook AdsLinkedIn Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagCrazy Egg
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotOptinMonster
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

DMARC Partial Enforcement

LOW

DMARC only applies to 25% of messages

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.signicat.cloud include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:ace-p-mailz-ext.p2.osl.basefarm.net a:bf-smtpno-mailout.osl.basefarm.net a:smtp.basefarm.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:4389192.spf08.hubspotemail.net include:servers.mcsv. net ip4:98.128.231.195 -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none(25% enforcement)
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@instabank.no

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:192.124.249.63
Name Servers:
ns1.hyp.netDNS only
ns2.hyp.netDNS only
ns3.hyp.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: instabank-no.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1758786788, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.signicat.cloud include:spf.protection.outlook.com a:ace-p-mailz-ext.p2.osl.basefarm.net a:bf-smtpno-mailout.osl.basefarm.net a:smtp.basefarm.net include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:4389192.spf08.hubspotemail.net include:servers.mcsv. net ip4:98.128.231.195 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, ensuring ease of content management and responsive design. It integrates a variety of marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Crazy Egg, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure, supporting scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices such as meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved to meet higher standards. The technical stack is well-suited for a financial services website, balancing functionality and user experience while maintaining compliance with privacy regulations.
Analyze Another Website