Is intensedebate.com Safe? Security Analysis for Automattic Inc.
Check if intensedebate.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
IntenseDebate is a feature-rich commenting system designed to enhance user engagement on blogs and websites, supporting platforms such as WordPress, Tumblr, and Blogger. Owned by Automattic Inc., the service offers threaded comments, social media login integration, email notifications, and spam filtering via Akismet. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image aligned with its parent company, targeting bloggers and website owners seeking to improve community interaction. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, integrates with social platforms, and is hosted under Automattic's infrastructure with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though there is room for improvement in DNSSEC and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is strong, referencing comprehensive policies hosted on Automattic's domain, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and well-positioned within its niche.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates within the technology sector, focusing on SaaS solutions for comment management and community engagement. Its market position is supported by integration with major blogging platforms and social media, leveraging Automattic's brand and infrastructure. Revenue likely derives from service subscriptions or platform integrations. The target audience includes bloggers, website owners, and online communities seeking enhanced commenting features. The partnership ecosystem includes Akismet for spam filtering and social media platforms for login capabilities. The company demonstrates stable growth indicators with a domain age of over 17 years and consistent branding. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand security transparency and incident response readiness to further strengthen market trust.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags preventing unauthorized changes. Use of Akismet for spam filtering and reply-by-email moderation reduces exposure to spam and abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security policies or incident response contacts indicates gaps in security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed through comprehensive policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears aligned with industry best practices but could benefit from publishing a security.txt file and formal incident response procedures to enhance trust and readiness.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Automattic Inc.
IntenseDebate is a feature-rich comment system for WordPress, Tumblr, Blogger and many other website platforms that enhances and encourages conversation on blogs or websites.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- ClientDelete/Transfer/Update prohibited domain status
- Use of Akismet for spam filtering
- Reply-by-email moderation to reduce web interface exposure
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 46 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings