Skip to main content

Is internet-sicherheit.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Institut für Internet-Sicherheit - if(is) Reviews

internet-sicherheit.de favicon

Is internet-sicherheit.de Safe? Security Analysis for Institut für Internet-Sicherheit - if(is)

Check if internet-sicherheit.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsFontAwesomeElementorWP Rocket
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 8:51:41 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Institut für Internet-Sicherheit (if(is)) is a German research institute specializing in internet security. The website serves as an informational and educational platform targeting researchers, professionals, and students interested in internet security topics. The site is built on WordPress using Elementor and WP Rocket, with Matomo analytics integrated for user tracking. While the technical infrastructure is modern and the site is mobile optimized, there is a lack of visible privacy, cookie, and security policies, which impacts compliance and trust. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting user engagement and transparency. Security headers and explicit security best practices are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security posture.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsFontAwesomeElementorWP Rocket

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The institute operates in the technology sector with a focus on internet security research and education. Its market position is niche, serving a specialized audience in Germany. The business model is research and educational, with no commercial or e-commerce elements detected. The website links to related partner domains such as it-sicherheit.de, indicating collaboration within the internet security community. The absence of certifications or formal trust indicators suggests the institute relies on its academic reputation. Growth and partnership opportunities could be enhanced by improving transparency and adding contact and compliance information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic with HTTPS presumably enabled but no detected security headers or explicit security policies. The use of Matomo analytics indicates some privacy-conscious tracking, but lack of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies is a compliance gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, which is a risk for timely handling of security incidents. The site should implement security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and provide clear incident response contacts to improve security maturity and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Institut für Internet-Sicherheit - if(is)

Description:

The Institut für Internet-Sicherheit (Institute for Internet Security) appears to be an organization focused on internet security research and education. The website content is in German and targets users interested in internet security topics.

Key Services:
Internet security researchEducational resourcesSecurity awareness
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptMatomo AnalyticsFontAwesomeElementorWP Rocket
Frameworks:
WordPressYoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is in German and focused on internet security research.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

73/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@internet-sicherheit.de
MTA-STS Details
Mode:testing
Max Age:7 days

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:194.94.127.125
Name Servers:
deneb.dfn.de
dns-1.dfn.de
ns1.internet-sicherheit.deDNS only
MX Records:
20: smtp9.internet-sicherheit.de
10: smtp.internet-sicherheit.de
SOA:Serial: 2025061118, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:140ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and WP Rocket for performance optimization. Matomo analytics is used for tracking, indicating a preference for privacy-friendly analytics. The site is mobile optimized and uses standard web fonts and icon libraries like FontAwesome. However, no hosting provider information is detected, and performance is moderate. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding security headers and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website