Skip to main content

Is invector.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA "INVECTOR" Reviews

S

Is invector.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA "INVECTOR"

Check if invector.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:31:31 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA "INVECTOR" is a Latvian-based company specializing in solar panel installation services for both industrial and residential clients. The website showcases their portfolio through image galleries and emphasizes quality workmanship and customer service. The business targets customers interested in renewable energy solutions, positioning itself as a local expert in solar energy installations. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, featuring responsive design and moderate performance. However, the site lacks critical security and privacy features such as HTTPS verification, privacy policies, and contact details, which impacts its overall trustworthiness and compliance posture. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a professional business front but requires improvements in security, privacy, and transparency to enhance credibility and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the energy sector, focusing on solar panel installation. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to both commercial and residential markets. The website content is targeted at potential customers seeking eco-friendly energy solutions. The absence of detailed company registration data and contact information limits external validation. The company appears to be a small-sized local business without visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The website content quality is good, but branding consistency is moderate due to limited trust signals and missing policies. There is no evidence of advanced marketing or analytics tools, indicating a straightforward digital presence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security posture. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers in the provided data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is available. The site does not appear to use any known security frameworks or certifications. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security best practices, including SSL/TLS configuration, security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA "INVECTOR"

Description:

SIA "INVECTOR" is a professional team highly qualified and experienced in solar panel installation for industrial and residential purposes. They provide quality work and excellent customer service.

Key Services:
solar panel installation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Frameworks:
Tilda Publishing
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.243
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: invector.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073007, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Tilda CMS, leveraging standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. It features responsive design with galleries and animations. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts. The site lacks explicit accessibility features and SEO optimizations are basic. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML. The technical implementation is functional but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to improve user experience and compliance.
Analyze Another Website