Skip to main content

Is invoicer.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - InvoiceR Reviews

I

Is invoicer.lv Safe? Security Analysis for InvoiceR

Check if invoicer.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
Bootstrap 4.6.2jQuery 3.7.1Google Fonts (Nunito Sans, Quicksand)Vanilla LazyLoadYandex Metrika+3 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:24:56 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

InvoiceR.lv is a Latvian-based SaaS platform specializing in simple invoice generation and client management for small and medium businesses, private entrepreneurs, and accountants. Founded in 2016, it offers a freemium model with tiered subscription plans providing features such as invoice creation, client and service management, monthly invoice automation, and API integration. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and pricing transparency. The platform targets Russian and Latvian-speaking markets primarily. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Google Fonts, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, and Microsoft Clarity. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks some advanced security headers. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present but no detailed GDPR compliance statements or data retention policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional business presence with moderate technical maturity and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing detailed security and privacy policies, and providing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 4.6.2jQuery 3.7.1Google Fonts (Nunito Sans, Quicksand)Vanilla LazyLoadYandex MetrikaGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Microsoft ClarityJivoSite chat widget

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

InvoiceR.lv occupies a niche in the invoicing SaaS market focused on small and medium enterprises and private entrepreneurs in Latvia and Russian-speaking regions. Its competitive advantage lies in simplicity, automation features, and API integration. Revenue streams are subscription-based with a free tier to attract users. The company maintains partnerships with various local businesses, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth indicators include multi-language support and expanding feature sets. The business model is straightforward SaaS with clear pricing tiers. Strategic observations suggest focusing on compliance and security enhancements to strengthen market position and trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

o*****@invoicer.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712232****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent but lacks detailed GDPR adherence documentation. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Business impact of these gaps includes potential trust erosion and regulatory risk. Enhancing security policies, incident response readiness, and privacy transparency is recommended.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

InvoiceR

Description:

InvoiceR.lv is a simple invoice generation system created in 2016 to assist small businesses and private clients. It offers features such as client management, service listings, invoice creation and storage, monthly invoice automation, and integration with Redmine for work tracking. Basic registration and minimal features are free, with paid plans for advanced functionality.

Key Services:
Invoice creation and storageClient and service managementMonthly invoice automationAPI and backend integration
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 4.6.2jQuery 3.7.1Google Fonts (Nunito Sans, Quicksand)Vanilla LazyLoadYandex MetrikaGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Microsoft ClarityJivoSite chat widget
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Yandex MetrikaGoogle AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Yandex MetrikaMicrosoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
JivoSite chat
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Russian language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

43/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ip4:5.9.30.202 ip4:5.9.30.220 ip4:94.130.138.19 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@invoicer.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:5.9.30.202
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
50: mail.invoicer.lv
SOA:Serial: 1718560275, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:404ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ip4:5.9.30.202 ip4:5.9.30.220 ip4:94.130.138.19 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website infrastructure is built on a modern tech stack featuring Bootstrap 4, jQuery, and Google Fonts, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Lazy loading of images improves performance. Integration with multiple analytics platforms (Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Microsoft Clarity) and marketing tools (Google Ads, JivoSite chat) indicates a mature digital marketing approach. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture, which may limit scalability. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which may introduce vulnerabilities or privacy concerns. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility features to enhance overall technical robustness.
Analyze Another Website