Skip to main content

Is iog.net a Scam? Security Check Results - IOG Foundation Reviews

iog.net favicon

Is iog.net Safe? Security Analysis for IOG Foundation

Check if iog.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScript (ES Modules)CSSCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:11:03 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The IOG Foundation operates as a technology-focused nonprofit entity dedicated to decentralizing cloud computing through blockchain and AI ecosystems. The foundation supports community growth via grants, developer tools, and governance of the $IO token ecosystem. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting developers and blockchain enthusiasts. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript modules and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating room for security improvements. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms policies, as well as contact information, limits compliance and user trust. Overall, the site is accessible and functional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript (ES Modules)CSSCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation positions itself as a key enabler in decentralized cloud computing and blockchain token governance. Its business model centers on community empowerment through grants and developer tools, targeting a niche but growing market segment. The domain's long registration history supports credibility. The foundation's ecosystem includes external services like IO Cloud and IO Worker, indicating a broader technical infrastructure. However, the lack of published contact and compliance information may hinder broader adoption and trust. Strategic partnerships and clearer business disclosures could enhance market positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and critical security headers, which are standard best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, indicating limited transparency in security operations. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The security posture is moderate but requires improvements in DNS security, header implementation, and published policies to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR or NIS2.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

IOG Foundation

Description:

The IOG Foundation fosters community growth and promotes a friendly environment for participation in decentralized cloud computing. It supports an open, inclusive community through grants and programs empowering builders and advocates in the decentralized AI ecosystem. The foundation provides developer tools, blockchain info related to the $IO token, and governance for the $IO Coin Ecosystem.

Key Services:
Grant programsDeveloper tools (IO Cloud, IO Worker)Blockchain information and token governance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript (ES Modules)CSSCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Unknown (custom or minimal framework detected)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd43:c0d1:c090::/48 include:_spf.google.com ~all v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:iog.net
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/16/2025 (71 days)
SANs:iog.net, *.iog.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2343 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.9.23, 104.18.8.23
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:817, 2606:4700::6812:917
Name Servers:
etienne.ns.cloudflare.com
heidi.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mail.protonmail.ch
20: mailsec.protonmail.ch
SOA:Serial: 2381046094, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip6:fd43:c0d1:c090::/48 include:_spf.google.com ~all v=spf1 include:_spf.protonmail.ch ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern JavaScript modules and CSS with a clean, responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, enhancing availability and performance. However, no CMS or major frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom or minimalistic build. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts indicates minimal user data collection, aligning with privacy best practices but limiting marketing insights.
Analyze Another Website