Skip to main content

Is ionic.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Ionic Reviews

ionic.io favicon

Is ionic.io Safe? Security Analysis for Ionic

Check if ionic.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyPortugalenterprise
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot (cookie consent)+2 more
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 3:58:08 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ionic is an established enterprise app platform founded in 2014 and headquartered in Portugal. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for building, securing, and delivering cross-platform mobile, web, and desktop applications using a shared code base and open web standards. The platform is well-positioned in the technology sector, targeting enterprise businesses and developers seeking scalable app development solutions. Ionic's market position is reinforced by its open source foundation and adoption by major companies such as T-Mobile, BBC, and USAA. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with Cloudflare DNS and Google Tag Manager integrations, delivering a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no direct contact information is visible on the homepage, which slightly impacts privacy compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident in the provided data. Overall, Ionic demonstrates a strong digital maturity and business credibility, though improvements in privacy transparency and security disclosures are recommended.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot (cookie consent)SVG graphicsWeb fonts (woff2)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Ionic operates as an essential technology entity focusing on enterprise-grade app development solutions. Its business model revolves around providing a robust platform that integrates mobile SDKs, CI/CD pipelines, micro frontends, and security features, appealing to large organizations and developers. The company benefits from a strong open source ecosystem, including projects like Ionic Framework, Capacitor, and Stencil, which enhance its competitive advantage. The presence of high-profile clients and a comprehensive resource center indicates a mature market presence and a well-established partnership ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include enterprise subscriptions, professional services, and support. The company targets developers, architects, IT executives, and startups, reflecting a broad customer segmentation. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy and security transparency to maintain trust and comply with evolving regulations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Ionic's security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security resilience. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The lack of visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. The site uses modern technologies and does not show signs of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ionic

Description:

Build, secure, and deliver amazing cross-platform mobile, web, and desktop apps all with one shared code base and open-web standards. The only enterprise-grade app platform fully powered by open source.

Key Services:
Mobile App Development SDKMobile CI/CD (Appflow)Micro Frontends (Portals)Mobile Security (Auth Connect, Identity Vault, Biometrics, Secure Storage)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSGoogle Tag ManagerHubSpot (cookie consent)SVG graphicsWeb fonts (woff2)
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
WebMobileDesktop
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:u2480083.wl084.sendgrid.net include:3776657.spf07.hubspotemail.net include:_spf.salesforce.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:799fefd5699f4f10989110800115e038@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:ionic.io
Issuer:E7
Valid Until:12/6/2025 (63 days)
SANs:ionic.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(603 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.20.24.198, 172.66.164.120
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:a478, 2606:4700:10::6814:18c6
Name Servers:
nina.ns.cloudflare.com
woz.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2384108238, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:39ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:u2480083.wl084.sendgrid.net include:3776657.spf07.hubspotemail.net include:_spf.salesforce.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a performant and responsive user experience. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, contributing to fast content delivery and DNS reliability. The site uses Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and cookie consent management, indicating integration with marketing and compliance tools. The design is professional with excellent mobile optimization and accessibility features. However, the absence of detected security headers and DNSSEC represents technical risks. The site does not appear to use a traditional CMS but leverages HubSpot scripts for cookie consent. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust but could be enhanced with additional security configurations and privacy transparency.
Analyze Another Website