Skip to main content

Is ippeak.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ippeak.com Reviews

I

Is ippeak.com Safe? Security Analysis for IPPeak - Fast and Reliable Quality Residential Proxies

Check if ippeak.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft Clarity
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:44:32 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

IPPeak is a provider of fast and reliable residential proxy services targeting businesses and individuals requiring proxy solutions. The website presents basic information about their proxy offerings but lacks detailed business and contact information. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies such as Tailwind CSS and integrates analytics tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy policies, terms of service, and contact details reflects gaps in compliance and user trust facilitation. Security posture is limited by lack of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration, which should be addressed to enhance protection and trustworthiness. Overall, the domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Strategic improvements in compliance documentation, security practices, and business transparency are recommended to strengthen the company's online presence and trust.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft Clarity

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

IPPeak operates in the technology sector as a residential proxy service provider. The business model focuses on offering proxy IP addresses to clients for various internet activities requiring residential IPs. The target market likely includes digital marketers, data scrapers, and cybersecurity professionals. The website lacks detailed information on company size, founding year, or parent/subsidiary relationships, limiting deeper business intelligence insights. The presence of tracking and analytics tools suggests an interest in user behavior analysis and marketing optimization. The absence of clear trust indicators such as certifications or client testimonials suggests the company is either new or has limited public market presence. Enhancing transparency and providing more comprehensive business information could improve market positioning and customer confidence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of the IPPeak website is currently basic. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocks, but no security headers were detected in the provided data, and SSL configuration details are unknown. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of contact information for incident response or data protection officers, indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are evident. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools introduces potential attack surfaces that require monitoring. To improve security posture, the company should implement comprehensive security headers, enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS settings, publish privacy and cookie policies, and establish clear incident response contacts. These steps will reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

IPPeak offers fast and reliable quality residential proxies services.

Key Services:
Residential proxies
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerMicrosoft Clarity
Frameworks:
Tailwind CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Microsoft ClarityGoogle Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 10 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:154.197.56.204
Name Servers:
vip3.alidns.comDNS only
vip4.alidns.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073015, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Tailwind CSS for styling and integrates analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager. The HTML content is well-structured but truncated in the provided data, limiting full analysis. No CMS or hosting provider information was identified. Performance appears moderate with mobile optimization rated as good. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic and could be improved. The absence of visible security headers and unknown SSL configuration represent technical risks. The site lacks forms or data collection fields in the analyzed content, reducing immediate data exposure risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small technology service provider but requires enhancements in security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website