Skip to main content

Is iread.wang a Scam? Security Check Results - 爱阅读 Reviews

iread.wang favicon

Is iread.wang Safe? Security Analysis for 爱阅读

Check if iread.wang is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationChinasmall
jQuery 1.10.0Custom JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 12:51:44 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.iread.wang operates as an educational content platform primarily targeting Chinese-speaking users interested in phrases, classic quotes, sentence making, and general knowledge. It offers free learning materials and maintains a consistent branding and content quality focused on education. The site uses WordPress CMS with jQuery and custom scripts, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the technical stack includes outdated libraries and lacks advanced security headers. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but it does not provide privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Contact information is limited to a generic email address, and no phone or social media contacts are provided. The ICP license indicates hosting in China and some regulatory adherence. WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.10.0Custom JavaScriptCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model centers on content publishing and educational resource provision in the Chinese language education sector. The site targets learners and readers seeking curated phrases, quotes, and knowledge. It holds a niche market position with no evident commercial transactions or monetization visible. The external links suggest partnerships with various educational and content-related websites. The lack of company registration data and generic contact email reduce business credibility. The site appears to be a small-scale operation without clear corporate backing or subsidiaries.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

t*****@foxmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of an outdated jQuery version may pose security risks if exploited. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR or similar regulations. Incident response and security policy information are not provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

爱阅读

Description:

爱阅读是一个免费的阅读类网站,为您提供更多更全的好词好句、造句组词、经典语录、经典诗词等各种实用学习文档资料

Key Services:
Good words and sentencesSentence making and word groupingClassic quotesEncyclopedia knowledgePopular internet memes
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.10.0Custom JavaScriptCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 53 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.iread.wang
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:9/25/2025 (53 days)
SANs:iread.wang, www.iread.wang

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(139 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:101.200.74.32
Name Servers:
dns11.hichina.com
dns12.hichina.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with custom theming and uses jQuery 1.10.0, which is outdated and may pose security risks. The site loads CSS and JavaScript resources from its own domain and uses Baidu for search functionality integration. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy resources or delays. Accessibility features are basic, with some alt attributes on images but no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility tags. SEO is supported by canonical links and descriptive meta tags. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website