Skip to main content

Is irideweb.it a Scam? Security Check Results - irideweb.it Reviews

I

Is irideweb.it Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if irideweb.it is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 10:00:34 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at irideweb.it is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page served by Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. Due to this access restriction, no meaningful content, metadata, or business information could be extracted or analyzed. The domain is registered since 2019 with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a legitimate registration and moderate domain age appropriate for a small business. However, the lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the company's business model, services, or market position. Technically, the site is hosted on Microsoft Azure infrastructure but lacks publicly visible security headers or SSL configuration details. The security posture cannot be properly evaluated due to the blocked content. Privacy and compliance policies are not found, and no contact or social media information is available. Overall, the site appears to be either restricted intentionally or misconfigured, resulting in a poor user and security experience.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

No business intelligence data could be extracted due to the absence of accessible website content. The domain age and DNSSEC status suggest a legitimate registration, but no information about company name, services, or market positioning is available. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business sector and entity type remain unknown.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture assessment is limited by the lack of accessible content and headers. The domain uses DNSSEC, which is a positive indicator. The site is hosted on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, which may provide some security features. However, the 403 Forbidden response indicates either a security block or misconfiguration. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are found. The absence of security headers and SSL configuration details further limits the evaluation. Overall, the security posture is unknown but likely weak due to access restrictions.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow public access and enable comprehensive analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page served by Microsoft-Azure-Application-Gateway/v2 indicating access is blocked or restricted.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.webapps.net ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(218 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC ON
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:20.103.5.17
Name Servers:
ns1.register.itDNS only
ns2.register.itDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.register.it
SOA:Serial: 2025040403, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.webapps.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on Microsoft Azure Application Gateway v2, which suggests a cloud-based infrastructure. However, the site returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content and no metadata, scripts, or forms. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The lack of content and metadata indicates either a security block or misconfiguration. No performance, SEO, or accessibility data can be assessed. The technical implementation is incomplete or improperly configured, resulting in poor user experience and inability to analyze the site.
Analyze Another Website