Skip to main content

Is irititja.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Aṟa Irititja Reviews

A

Is irititja.com Safe? Security Analysis for Aṟa Irititja

Check if irititja.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitAustraliasmall
jQueryBootstrapSlick CarouselMagnific PopupFont Awesome
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:18:51 AM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Aṟa Irititja is a culturally significant non-profit project dedicated to preserving and repatriating Indigenous Australian cultural materials to the Aṉangu people. The website serves as a portal to interactive multimedia archives and provides access to historical photographs, films, and documents. The organization has a long-standing presence since 2002, reflected in the domain age and consistent registration data. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, offering a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced DNS security and HTTP security headers. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Detected Technologies

jQueryBootstrapSlick CarouselMagnific PopupFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the non-profit cultural heritage sector, targeting Indigenous communities and cultural preservation stakeholders. Its business model focuses on digital archiving and repatriation of culturally sensitive materials using proprietary software. The project maintains a niche market position with a clear cultural mission and partnerships implied by content references. Revenue streams are likely grant or donation-based, supported by a donate button on the site. The absence of commercial advertising or analytics suggests a focus on mission over monetization. The website's content and structure support community engagement and knowledge sharing, although contact details and formal policies are limited.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes transfer and update prohibitions, reducing risk of hijacking. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduce defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting responsiveness to security events. No vulnerable libraries were detected in the scripts used. The site does not collect sensitive user data via forms, reducing exposure. Overall, security practices are functional but could be significantly improved to meet modern standards and compliance requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Aṟa Irititja

Description:

Aṟa Irititja is a cultural and historical archive project aimed at delivering materials of significance to the Aṉangu people of Central Australia. It provides interactive multimedia software called Keeping Culture KMS to digitally store and repatriate photographs, films, sound recordings, and documents to the Aṉangu community.

Key Services:
Digital archiving of cultural materialsRepatriation of cultural and historical contentInteractive multimedia software (Keeping Culture KMS)
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryBootstrapSlick CarouselMagnific PopupFont Awesome
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a cultural archive project focused on Indigenous Australian communities.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all\default._domainkeyTXTv=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA6yz+qlY5FPxizf9zpIYoMhQ5Bo6mwxo9v8mjoGVezQsWLjcTk3iF2yDPVRTzInoyJMVXbpyD5WFUnYly9Xm1iVXll0lJEiChBUSCL6ONkXa4qBmJ98I+gC9KBwe0X7TCgxspWtR0 zVqeio/jmQyKe4XTJc7v3blb2PYrC9yzTVGI0oYMr9TG3P2ai33Ogl1JtiK0WOLWIkNFk5cJhPEc1MlGAs1cCcisRi3FFmbYNdtPWMLxoOTXQ5t1S5RAYTr7kknZX9w9M8a2TGrMkNiCIV7JHidme+1LiJt1Ni/sfHG9T0xkiyjcasNZf9zl/VBlFOd27Vgb9c2qg+OTwbPEFQIDAQAB;\
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(285 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.250.232.192
Name Servers:
ns1.server-cpanel.com
ns2.server-cpanel.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071900, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:125ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all\default._domainkeyTXTv=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA6yz+qlY5FPxizf9zpIYoMhQ5Bo6mwxo9v8mjoGVezQsWLjcTk3iF2yDPVRTzInoyJMVXbpyD5WFUnYly9Xm1iVXll0lJEiChBUSCL6ONkXa4qBmJ98I+gC9KBwe0X7TCgxspWtR0 zVqeio/jmQyKe4XTJc7v3blb2PYrC9yzTVGI0oYMr9TG3P2ai33Ogl1JtiK0WOLWIkNFk5cJhPEc1MlGAs1cCcisRi3FFmbYNdtPWMLxoOTXQ5t1S5RAYTr7kknZX9w9M8a2TGrMkNiCIV7JHidme+1LiJt1Ni/sfHG9T0xkiyjcasNZf9zl/VBlFOd27Vgb9c2qg+OTwbPEFQIDAQAB;\ v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, and Magnific Popup for UI components. Hosting appears to be on cPanel servers managed by Netregistry Wholesale Pty Ltd, the domain registrar. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Font Awesome for icons. Performance is moderate with autoplay sliders and image galleries. Mobile optimization is good with responsive CSS. Accessibility features are basic with no explicit ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility tags detected. SEO is basic with meta viewport and canonical tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found. Technical debt is low but modernization opportunities include adding structured data and improving accessibility and security headers.
Analyze Another Website